Comparability of narrow and wide field-of-view head-mounted displays for medium-field distance judgments

J. Adam Jones, Evan A. Suma, David M. Krum, Mark Bolas

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

19 Scopus citations

Abstract

As wider field-of-view displays become more common, the question arises as to whether or not data collected on these displays are comparable to those collected with smaller field-of-view displays. This document describes a pilot study that aimed to address these concerns by comparing medium-field distance judgments in a 60° FOV display, a 150° FOV display, and a simulated 60° FOV within the 150° FOV display. The results indicate that participants performed similarly in both the actual and simulated 60° FOV displays. On average, participants in the 150° FOV display improved distance judgments by 13% over the 60° FOV displays.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationProceedings, SAP 2012 - ACM Symposium on Applied Perception
Number of pages1
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 4 2012
Externally publishedYes
Event2012 ACM Symposium on Applied Perception, SAP 2012 - Santa Monica, CA, United States
Duration: Aug 3 2012Aug 4 2012

Publication series

NameProceedings, SAP 2012 - ACM Symposium on Applied Perception

Other

Other2012 ACM Symposium on Applied Perception, SAP 2012
CountryUnited States
CitySanta Monica, CA
Period8/3/128/4/12

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comparability of narrow and wide field-of-view head-mounted displays for medium-field distance judgments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this