Comparability and accuracy of time of wetness sensing methods relevant for atmospheric corrosion

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The performance of three time of wetness (TOW) determination methods during outdoor exposure was examined. Two impedance-based TOW sensor types, RH, and temperature sensors were exposed to coastal marine and laboratory environments for up to three months. The sensor and ISO 9223 methods examined provided incomparable estimates. Inaccuracy of the ISO method originated from a humidity threshold well above the drying point of deposited aerosols and differences between surface and ambient RH. TOW sensor accuracy was linked to electrode configuration. Small electrode spacing was demonstrated to be required to capture the range of wetting events of importance to atmospheric corrosion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)233-241
Number of pages9
JournalCorrosion Science
Volume67
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2013
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
    SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
  2. SDG 9 - Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
    SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
  3. SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production
    SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production

Keywords

  • Atmospheric corrosion (C)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparability and accuracy of time of wetness sensing methods relevant for atmospheric corrosion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this