TY - JOUR
T1 - Comorbidity between ADDH and Learning Disability
T2 - A Review and Report in a Clinically Referred Sample
AU - SEMRUD-CLIKEMAN, MARGARET
AU - BIEDERMAN, JOSEPH
AU - SPRICH-BUCKMINSTER, SUSAN
AU - LEHMAN, BELINDA KRIFCHER
AU - FARAONE, STEPHEN V.
AU - NORMAN, DENNIS
PY - 1992
Y1 - 1992
N2 - A widely variable overlap ranging from 10 to 92% has been reported in the literature between attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity (ADDH) and learning disability (LD), most likely a result of inconsistencies in the criteria used to define LD in different studies. The following study seeks to more accurately determine rates of LD in clinically referred children. Using a psychometrically reliable methodological approach, it was expected that the rate of LD in ADDH children would be far more modest than previously reported. Subjects were referred children with ADDH (N = 60), children with academic problems (N = 30), and normal controls (N = 36) of both sexes with available psychological and achievement testing. Using a liberal definition of LD, significant differences were found between the groups (ADDH = 38% versus academic problems = 43% versus normals = 8%; p = 0.002). In contrast, more modest rates were found using two more stringent methods of assessment (23 and 17%; 10 and 3%; 2 and 0%, respectively; p = 0.02). Arithmetic-based LD appears to be equally identified by both stringent methods, whereas the liberal definition overidentified children in all three groups. These findings show that a liberal definition of LD overidentifies LD not only in ADDH children but also in normal children.
AB - A widely variable overlap ranging from 10 to 92% has been reported in the literature between attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity (ADDH) and learning disability (LD), most likely a result of inconsistencies in the criteria used to define LD in different studies. The following study seeks to more accurately determine rates of LD in clinically referred children. Using a psychometrically reliable methodological approach, it was expected that the rate of LD in ADDH children would be far more modest than previously reported. Subjects were referred children with ADDH (N = 60), children with academic problems (N = 30), and normal controls (N = 36) of both sexes with available psychological and achievement testing. Using a liberal definition of LD, significant differences were found between the groups (ADDH = 38% versus academic problems = 43% versus normals = 8%; p = 0.002). In contrast, more modest rates were found using two more stringent methods of assessment (23 and 17%; 10 and 3%; 2 and 0%, respectively; p = 0.02). Arithmetic-based LD appears to be equally identified by both stringent methods, whereas the liberal definition overidentified children in all three groups. These findings show that a liberal definition of LD overidentifies LD not only in ADDH children but also in normal children.
KW - attention deficit disorder
KW - attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder
KW - comorbidity
KW - learning disability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026729631&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026729631&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/00004583-199205000-00009
DO - 10.1097/00004583-199205000-00009
M3 - Article
C2 - 1592775
AN - SCOPUS:0026729631
SN - 0890-8567
VL - 31
SP - 439
EP - 448
JO - Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
JF - Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
IS - 3
ER -