TY - JOUR
T1 - Community-Oriented Primary Care
T2 - Implementation of a National Rural Demonstration
AU - Kukulka, G.
AU - Christianson, J. B.
AU - Moscovice, I. S.
AU - DeVries, R.
PY - 1994/6/1
Y1 - 1994/6/1
N2 - A major objective of community-oriented primary care (COPC) is to focus the clinical practice on the health care problems of the community that the practice serves. The COPC process defines the community of interest, identifies and prioritizes community health problems, and implements and evaluates interventions. Under sponsorship from the W. K. Kellogg Foundation, the COPC National Rural Demonstration Program was established to explore the feasibility of implementing COPC in 13 rural practices. An evaluation of the program found that local communities played critical roles in defining and implementing COPC interventions. These interventions were most often focused on health promotion/illness prevention activities. At most sites, clinical practices were limited in their ability to incorporate COPC activities by staff and physician turnover and the extensive patient demands on the time of rural primary care physicians. While the COPC process proceeded at different rates across the sites, after 2 1/2 years of grant funding, most sites continued to devote the majority of their resources to designing and implementing interventions. Thus, it appears that coordination by dedicated nonphysician staff and more than 2 years of effort are required to implement COPC concepts in rural practices in underserved areas.
AB - A major objective of community-oriented primary care (COPC) is to focus the clinical practice on the health care problems of the community that the practice serves. The COPC process defines the community of interest, identifies and prioritizes community health problems, and implements and evaluates interventions. Under sponsorship from the W. K. Kellogg Foundation, the COPC National Rural Demonstration Program was established to explore the feasibility of implementing COPC in 13 rural practices. An evaluation of the program found that local communities played critical roles in defining and implementing COPC interventions. These interventions were most often focused on health promotion/illness prevention activities. At most sites, clinical practices were limited in their ability to incorporate COPC activities by staff and physician turnover and the extensive patient demands on the time of rural primary care physicians. While the COPC process proceeded at different rates across the sites, after 2 1/2 years of grant funding, most sites continued to devote the majority of their resources to designing and implementing interventions. Thus, it appears that coordination by dedicated nonphysician staff and more than 2 years of effort are required to implement COPC concepts in rural practices in underserved areas.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028450697&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028450697&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1001/archfami.3.6.495
DO - 10.1001/archfami.3.6.495
M3 - Article
C2 - 8081528
SN - 1063-3987
VL - 3
SP - 495
EP - 501
JO - Archives of Family Medicine
JF - Archives of Family Medicine
IS - 6
ER -