Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine one community-based, interagency policy effort from two contrasting perspectives: critical theory (modernist) and postmodernist. To illustrate this juxtaposition we explored neighbourhood resident participation in community-based interagency collaboration within the context of decentralization. Using qualitative methodology, we observed team meetings and interviewed participants. While community-based interagency collaboration could be considered an 'empowering' strategy for community residents, from poststructural perspectives it could be a way to maintain the status quo. Through the analysis, we unpack this dichotomy of critical versus poststructural perspectives - mpowerment versus the reinforcement of existing power relationships - by suggesting that poststructural perspectives of power can flow between residents and agency team members. We deconstruct the assumption that such a policy initiative is either empowering or constraining by suggesting it could be both for all participants involved.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 335-351 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Journal of Education Policy |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 1 1994 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Community-based interagency collaboration: A poststructural interruption of critical practices1'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS