Communication modality sampling for a toddler with Angelman syndrome

Jolene K Hyppa Martin, Joe E Reichle, Adele F Dimian, Mo Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Vocal, gestural, and graphic communication modes were implemented concurrently with a toddler with Angelman syndrome to identify themost efficiently learned communication mode to emphasize in an initial augmentative communication system. Method: Symbols representing preferred objects were introduced in vocal, gestural, and graphic communicationmodes using an alternating treatment single-subject experimental design. Conventionally accepted prompting strategies were used to teach symbols in each communication mode. Because the learner did not vocally imitate, vocal mode intervention focused on increasing vocal frequency as an initial step. Results: When graphic and gestural mode performances were compared, the learner most accurately produced requests in graphic mode (percentage of nonoverlapping data = 96). Given the lack of success in prompting vocal productions, a comparison between vocal and the other two communication modes was not made. Conclusion: A growing body of evidence suggests that concurrent modality sampling is a promising low-inference, data-driven procedure that can be used to inform selection of a communication mode(s) for initial emphasis with young children. Concurrent modality sampling can guide clinical decisions regarding the allocation of treatment resources to promote success in building an initial communicative repertoire.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)327-336
Number of pages10
JournalLanguage, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools
Volume44
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2013

Fingerprint

Angelman Syndrome
Communication
communication
symbol
Resource Allocation
communication system
Modality
Syndrome
Sampling
Toddlers
Communication Mode
Research Design
lack
resources
performance
evidence
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Angelman syndrome
  • Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC)
  • Communication modes
  • Modality sampling

Cite this

Communication modality sampling for a toddler with Angelman syndrome. / Hyppa Martin, Jolene K; Reichle, Joe E; Dimian, Adele F; Chen, Mo.

In: Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, Vol. 44, No. 4, 01.10.2013, p. 327-336.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hyppa Martin, Jolene K ; Reichle, Joe E ; Dimian, Adele F ; Chen, Mo. / Communication modality sampling for a toddler with Angelman syndrome. In: Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools. 2013 ; Vol. 44, No. 4. pp. 327-336.
@article{67f26dc18956477492f201a4a5a57ef7,
title = "Communication modality sampling for a toddler with Angelman syndrome",
abstract = "Purpose: Vocal, gestural, and graphic communication modes were implemented concurrently with a toddler with Angelman syndrome to identify themost efficiently learned communication mode to emphasize in an initial augmentative communication system. Method: Symbols representing preferred objects were introduced in vocal, gestural, and graphic communicationmodes using an alternating treatment single-subject experimental design. Conventionally accepted prompting strategies were used to teach symbols in each communication mode. Because the learner did not vocally imitate, vocal mode intervention focused on increasing vocal frequency as an initial step. Results: When graphic and gestural mode performances were compared, the learner most accurately produced requests in graphic mode (percentage of nonoverlapping data = 96). Given the lack of success in prompting vocal productions, a comparison between vocal and the other two communication modes was not made. Conclusion: A growing body of evidence suggests that concurrent modality sampling is a promising low-inference, data-driven procedure that can be used to inform selection of a communication mode(s) for initial emphasis with young children. Concurrent modality sampling can guide clinical decisions regarding the allocation of treatment resources to promote success in building an initial communicative repertoire.",
keywords = "Angelman syndrome, Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC), Communication modes, Modality sampling",
author = "{Hyppa Martin}, {Jolene K} and Reichle, {Joe E} and Dimian, {Adele F} and Mo Chen",
year = "2013",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1044/0161-1461(2013/12-0108)",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "327--336",
journal = "Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools",
issn = "0161-1461",
publisher = "American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA)",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Communication modality sampling for a toddler with Angelman syndrome

AU - Hyppa Martin, Jolene K

AU - Reichle, Joe E

AU - Dimian, Adele F

AU - Chen, Mo

PY - 2013/10/1

Y1 - 2013/10/1

N2 - Purpose: Vocal, gestural, and graphic communication modes were implemented concurrently with a toddler with Angelman syndrome to identify themost efficiently learned communication mode to emphasize in an initial augmentative communication system. Method: Symbols representing preferred objects were introduced in vocal, gestural, and graphic communicationmodes using an alternating treatment single-subject experimental design. Conventionally accepted prompting strategies were used to teach symbols in each communication mode. Because the learner did not vocally imitate, vocal mode intervention focused on increasing vocal frequency as an initial step. Results: When graphic and gestural mode performances were compared, the learner most accurately produced requests in graphic mode (percentage of nonoverlapping data = 96). Given the lack of success in prompting vocal productions, a comparison between vocal and the other two communication modes was not made. Conclusion: A growing body of evidence suggests that concurrent modality sampling is a promising low-inference, data-driven procedure that can be used to inform selection of a communication mode(s) for initial emphasis with young children. Concurrent modality sampling can guide clinical decisions regarding the allocation of treatment resources to promote success in building an initial communicative repertoire.

AB - Purpose: Vocal, gestural, and graphic communication modes were implemented concurrently with a toddler with Angelman syndrome to identify themost efficiently learned communication mode to emphasize in an initial augmentative communication system. Method: Symbols representing preferred objects were introduced in vocal, gestural, and graphic communicationmodes using an alternating treatment single-subject experimental design. Conventionally accepted prompting strategies were used to teach symbols in each communication mode. Because the learner did not vocally imitate, vocal mode intervention focused on increasing vocal frequency as an initial step. Results: When graphic and gestural mode performances were compared, the learner most accurately produced requests in graphic mode (percentage of nonoverlapping data = 96). Given the lack of success in prompting vocal productions, a comparison between vocal and the other two communication modes was not made. Conclusion: A growing body of evidence suggests that concurrent modality sampling is a promising low-inference, data-driven procedure that can be used to inform selection of a communication mode(s) for initial emphasis with young children. Concurrent modality sampling can guide clinical decisions regarding the allocation of treatment resources to promote success in building an initial communicative repertoire.

KW - Angelman syndrome

KW - Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC)

KW - Communication modes

KW - Modality sampling

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84885585216&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84885585216&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1044/0161-1461(2013/12-0108)

DO - 10.1044/0161-1461(2013/12-0108)

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 327

EP - 336

JO - Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools

JF - Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools

SN - 0161-1461

IS - 4

ER -