Communication managers in the dominant coalition: Power attributes and communication practices

Stacey Frank Kanihan, Kathleen A. Hansen, Sara Blair, Marta Shore, Jun Myers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine formal and informal types of power, and identify the characteristics of corporate communications managers who are in the dominant coalition. Design/methodology/approach: The paper reports on results of a survey sent to a representative sample of S&P 500 corporate communications managers and CEOs in the USA Data about industry sector, company size, annual revenue and profitability were collected for the responding companies and a random sample of 100 non-responding companies. The responding companies (n=161) did not significantly differ from the non-responding companies Findings: The paper finds that four attributes of informal power differentiate communications managers who are in the dominant coalition from those who are not: reciprocal trust, strategic business decision-making, social inclusion and communication expertise. Research limitations/implications: Future research should explore whether any of the 37 percent of communications managers in the dominant coalition at these top companies come from backgrounds significantly different from those of the executive elite. Practical implications: The paper supports the organizational theory of the importance of informal power as a prerequisite to be in the dominant coalition - particularly friendship and "being included." Communications managers who are in the dominant coalition are in a better position to institute ethical and excellent (symmetrical) communication practices. The findings of this study have implications for the likely success (or lack thereof) of managers with diverse backgrounds of being included in the dominant coalition. Originality/value: The paper provides quantitative, generalizable results based on a representative sample where many previous studies have relied on qualitative data alone.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)140-156
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Communication Management
Volume17
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2013

Fingerprint

coalition
Managers
manager
communication
Communication
corporate communication
Industry
communications
profitability
friendship
random sample
revenue
expertise
elite
inclusion
decision making
Profitability
industry
Decision making
lack

Keywords

  • Communication management
  • Corporate communications
  • Dominant coalition
  • Organizational culture
  • Power
  • Public relations

Cite this

Communication managers in the dominant coalition : Power attributes and communication practices. / Kanihan, Stacey Frank; Hansen, Kathleen A.; Blair, Sara; Shore, Marta; Myers, Jun.

In: Journal of Communication Management, Vol. 17, No. 2, 05.2013, p. 140-156.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f07f77f463c84530b15f03c0f8e89887,
title = "Communication managers in the dominant coalition: Power attributes and communication practices",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine formal and informal types of power, and identify the characteristics of corporate communications managers who are in the dominant coalition. Design/methodology/approach: The paper reports on results of a survey sent to a representative sample of S&P 500 corporate communications managers and CEOs in the USA Data about industry sector, company size, annual revenue and profitability were collected for the responding companies and a random sample of 100 non-responding companies. The responding companies (n=161) did not significantly differ from the non-responding companies Findings: The paper finds that four attributes of informal power differentiate communications managers who are in the dominant coalition from those who are not: reciprocal trust, strategic business decision-making, social inclusion and communication expertise. Research limitations/implications: Future research should explore whether any of the 37 percent of communications managers in the dominant coalition at these top companies come from backgrounds significantly different from those of the executive elite. Practical implications: The paper supports the organizational theory of the importance of informal power as a prerequisite to be in the dominant coalition - particularly friendship and {"}being included.{"} Communications managers who are in the dominant coalition are in a better position to institute ethical and excellent (symmetrical) communication practices. The findings of this study have implications for the likely success (or lack thereof) of managers with diverse backgrounds of being included in the dominant coalition. Originality/value: The paper provides quantitative, generalizable results based on a representative sample where many previous studies have relied on qualitative data alone.",
keywords = "Communication management, Corporate communications, Dominant coalition, Organizational culture, Power, Public relations",
author = "Kanihan, {Stacey Frank} and Hansen, {Kathleen A.} and Sara Blair and Marta Shore and Jun Myers",
year = "2013",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1108/13632541311318747",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "140--156",
journal = "Journal of Communication Management",
issn = "1363-254X",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Communication managers in the dominant coalition

T2 - Power attributes and communication practices

AU - Kanihan, Stacey Frank

AU - Hansen, Kathleen A.

AU - Blair, Sara

AU - Shore, Marta

AU - Myers, Jun

PY - 2013/5

Y1 - 2013/5

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine formal and informal types of power, and identify the characteristics of corporate communications managers who are in the dominant coalition. Design/methodology/approach: The paper reports on results of a survey sent to a representative sample of S&P 500 corporate communications managers and CEOs in the USA Data about industry sector, company size, annual revenue and profitability were collected for the responding companies and a random sample of 100 non-responding companies. The responding companies (n=161) did not significantly differ from the non-responding companies Findings: The paper finds that four attributes of informal power differentiate communications managers who are in the dominant coalition from those who are not: reciprocal trust, strategic business decision-making, social inclusion and communication expertise. Research limitations/implications: Future research should explore whether any of the 37 percent of communications managers in the dominant coalition at these top companies come from backgrounds significantly different from those of the executive elite. Practical implications: The paper supports the organizational theory of the importance of informal power as a prerequisite to be in the dominant coalition - particularly friendship and "being included." Communications managers who are in the dominant coalition are in a better position to institute ethical and excellent (symmetrical) communication practices. The findings of this study have implications for the likely success (or lack thereof) of managers with diverse backgrounds of being included in the dominant coalition. Originality/value: The paper provides quantitative, generalizable results based on a representative sample where many previous studies have relied on qualitative data alone.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine formal and informal types of power, and identify the characteristics of corporate communications managers who are in the dominant coalition. Design/methodology/approach: The paper reports on results of a survey sent to a representative sample of S&P 500 corporate communications managers and CEOs in the USA Data about industry sector, company size, annual revenue and profitability were collected for the responding companies and a random sample of 100 non-responding companies. The responding companies (n=161) did not significantly differ from the non-responding companies Findings: The paper finds that four attributes of informal power differentiate communications managers who are in the dominant coalition from those who are not: reciprocal trust, strategic business decision-making, social inclusion and communication expertise. Research limitations/implications: Future research should explore whether any of the 37 percent of communications managers in the dominant coalition at these top companies come from backgrounds significantly different from those of the executive elite. Practical implications: The paper supports the organizational theory of the importance of informal power as a prerequisite to be in the dominant coalition - particularly friendship and "being included." Communications managers who are in the dominant coalition are in a better position to institute ethical and excellent (symmetrical) communication practices. The findings of this study have implications for the likely success (or lack thereof) of managers with diverse backgrounds of being included in the dominant coalition. Originality/value: The paper provides quantitative, generalizable results based on a representative sample where many previous studies have relied on qualitative data alone.

KW - Communication management

KW - Corporate communications

KW - Dominant coalition

KW - Organizational culture

KW - Power

KW - Public relations

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878230950&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878230950&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/13632541311318747

DO - 10.1108/13632541311318747

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84878230950

VL - 17

SP - 140

EP - 156

JO - Journal of Communication Management

JF - Journal of Communication Management

SN - 1363-254X

IS - 2

ER -