Comments on "Smooth-pursuit eye movements: A comparison of two measurement techniques" by Lindsey, Holzman, Haberman, and Yasillo

William G. Iacono, David T. Lykken

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

D. T. Lindsey et al (1978) reported that the qualitative comparability of smooth-pursuit eye movement recordings derived from EOG and infrared reflection techniques is high. When Ss were examined who displayed what P. S. Holzman et al (1978) have labeled in their schizophrenic patients a "Type II" tracking dysfunction, there was poor correspondence between the 2 methods, indicating that the spikes evident in Type II tracking do not stem from movement of the eyes. (5 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)678-680
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of abnormal psychology
Volume88
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1979

Keywords

  • smooth-pursuit eye movement recordings derived from electro oculography vs infrared reflection techniques, schizophrenic patients

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comments on "Smooth-pursuit eye movements: A comparison of two measurement techniques" by Lindsey, Holzman, Haberman, and Yasillo'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this