Abstract
Ruth Ginzberg has proposed a model for a gynocentric science that might constitute a paradigm as described by Kuhn. The author argues that Ginzberg's model lacks certain essential features of paradigms as described by Kuhn. The differences may stem from more fundamental disagreements between them, including the possibility that some essential features of Ginzberg's gynocentric science place it outside the intended scope of Kuhn's analysis. 1990 by Hypatia, Inc.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 171-177 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | Hypatia |
Volume | 5 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Mar 1990 |