TY - JOUR
T1 - Combined Smoking Cessation and Alcohol Abstinence Treatment for People Experiencing Homelessness
T2 - A Randomized Trial
AU - Onigbogi, Olanrewaju
AU - Pratt, Rebekah
AU - Luo, Xianghua
AU - Everson-Rose, Susan A.
AU - Cooney, Ned L.
AU - Specker, Sheila
AU - Thomas, Janet
AU - Okuyemi, Kolawole
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.
PY - 2025/10/1
Y1 - 2025/10/1
N2 - Introduction In the United States, 80% of adults experiencing homelessness smoke combustible cigarettes. Power to Quit 2 (PTQ2) was a randomized clinical trial to test the efficacy of a combined smoking cessation and alcohol abstinence biobehavioral intervention, Intensive Smoking plus Alcohol (IS + A), versus Usual Care (UC) for adults experiencing homelessness. Methods PTQ2 was conducted in two urban homeless shelters in the Upper Midwest (2014–-2018). People who smoked and reported hazardous alcohol use (N = 344) were randomized to IS + A (10 sessions of cognitive behavioral therapy for smoking and alcohol cessation plus nicotine replacement therapy [NRT], n = 168) or UC (educational session on smoking and alcohol cessation plus NRT, n = 176). The primary hypothesis was that the intervention would result in greater biochemically verified 7-day point-prevalent smoking abstinence 26 weeks post-intervention compared with UC. Our secondary hypothesis was that the intervention would result in greater 30-day alcohol abstinence 26 weeks post-intervention compared with UC. Results At week 26, the IS + A intervention group did not differ from the UC group in expired carbon-monoxide-verified 7-day point-prevalent smoking abstinence (16.6% vs. 12.8%, P = .47) or rate of self-reported 30-day alcohol abstinence (91.1% vs. 90.2%, P = .75). Conclusions The IS + A intervention did not result in significantly better smoking or alcohol cessation outcomes than UC. Nonetheless, trends in the smoking outcome data favored the intervention group, underscoring the importance of continued research into biobehavioral interventions that address smoking and alcohol use among adults experiencing homelessness. Implications The study highlights the difficulty in observing changes in smoking outcomes in interventions tailored to concurrently address smoking and alcohol use among persons experiencing homelessness. The findings add to existing knowledge by providing evidence about the real-world complexities facing people who use tobacco and alcohol while experiencing homelessness.
AB - Introduction In the United States, 80% of adults experiencing homelessness smoke combustible cigarettes. Power to Quit 2 (PTQ2) was a randomized clinical trial to test the efficacy of a combined smoking cessation and alcohol abstinence biobehavioral intervention, Intensive Smoking plus Alcohol (IS + A), versus Usual Care (UC) for adults experiencing homelessness. Methods PTQ2 was conducted in two urban homeless shelters in the Upper Midwest (2014–-2018). People who smoked and reported hazardous alcohol use (N = 344) were randomized to IS + A (10 sessions of cognitive behavioral therapy for smoking and alcohol cessation plus nicotine replacement therapy [NRT], n = 168) or UC (educational session on smoking and alcohol cessation plus NRT, n = 176). The primary hypothesis was that the intervention would result in greater biochemically verified 7-day point-prevalent smoking abstinence 26 weeks post-intervention compared with UC. Our secondary hypothesis was that the intervention would result in greater 30-day alcohol abstinence 26 weeks post-intervention compared with UC. Results At week 26, the IS + A intervention group did not differ from the UC group in expired carbon-monoxide-verified 7-day point-prevalent smoking abstinence (16.6% vs. 12.8%, P = .47) or rate of self-reported 30-day alcohol abstinence (91.1% vs. 90.2%, P = .75). Conclusions The IS + A intervention did not result in significantly better smoking or alcohol cessation outcomes than UC. Nonetheless, trends in the smoking outcome data favored the intervention group, underscoring the importance of continued research into biobehavioral interventions that address smoking and alcohol use among adults experiencing homelessness. Implications The study highlights the difficulty in observing changes in smoking outcomes in interventions tailored to concurrently address smoking and alcohol use among persons experiencing homelessness. The findings add to existing knowledge by providing evidence about the real-world complexities facing people who use tobacco and alcohol while experiencing homelessness.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105017332143
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105017332143#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1093/ntr/ntaf085
DO - 10.1093/ntr/ntaf085
M3 - Article
C2 - 40375387
AN - SCOPUS:105017332143
SN - 1462-2203
VL - 27
SP - 1840
EP - 1845
JO - Nicotine and Tobacco Research
JF - Nicotine and Tobacco Research
IS - 10
ER -