TY - JOUR
T1 - Column selectivity in reversed-phase liquid chromatography
T2 - III. The physico-chemical basis of selectivity
AU - Wilson, N. S.
AU - Dolan, J. W.
AU - Snyder, L. R.
AU - Carr, P. W.
AU - Sander, L. C.
PY - 2002/7/5
Y1 - 2002/7/5
N2 - Reversed-phase liquid chromatography (RP-LC) retention data for 23 additional solutes have been acquired to further test and evaluate a general relationship from part I:log α=log (k/kref)=η′H(i)+σ′S(ii)+β′A (iii)+α′B(iv)+κ′C(v)The physico-chemical origin of terms i-v above is examined here by comparing values of (a) the solute parameters of Eq. (1) (η′, σ′, etc.) vs. solute molecular structure, and (b) the column parameters (H, S, etc.) vs. column properties (ligand length and concentration, pore diameter, end-capping). We conclude that terms i-v correspond, respectively, to hydrophobic (i), steric (ii), hydrogen bonding (iii, iv) and ionic (v) interactions between solute and stationary phase. While steric interaction (term ii) is superficially similar to what previously has been defined as "shape selectivity", the role of the solute and column in determining steric selectivity (term ii) appears more complex than previously proposed for "shape selectivity". Similarly, what has previously been called hydrogen bonding between donor solutes and an acceptor group in the stationary phase (term iv) is very likely an oversimplification.
AB - Reversed-phase liquid chromatography (RP-LC) retention data for 23 additional solutes have been acquired to further test and evaluate a general relationship from part I:log α=log (k/kref)=η′H(i)+σ′S(ii)+β′A (iii)+α′B(iv)+κ′C(v)The physico-chemical origin of terms i-v above is examined here by comparing values of (a) the solute parameters of Eq. (1) (η′, σ′, etc.) vs. solute molecular structure, and (b) the column parameters (H, S, etc.) vs. column properties (ligand length and concentration, pore diameter, end-capping). We conclude that terms i-v correspond, respectively, to hydrophobic (i), steric (ii), hydrogen bonding (iii, iv) and ionic (v) interactions between solute and stationary phase. While steric interaction (term ii) is superficially similar to what previously has been defined as "shape selectivity", the role of the solute and column in determining steric selectivity (term ii) appears more complex than previously proposed for "shape selectivity". Similarly, what has previously been called hydrogen bonding between donor solutes and an acceptor group in the stationary phase (term iv) is very likely an oversimplification.
KW - Column selectivity
KW - Hydrogen bonding
KW - Hydrophobic interaction
KW - Ion-exchange interaction
KW - Selectivity
KW - Shape selectivity
KW - Soluble parameters
KW - Stationary phases, LC
KW - Steric selectivity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037024699&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037024699&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0021-9673(02)00658-1
DO - 10.1016/S0021-9673(02)00658-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 12184620
AN - SCOPUS:0037024699
SN - 0021-9673
VL - 961
SP - 217
EP - 236
JO - Journal of Chromatography A
JF - Journal of Chromatography A
IS - 2
ER -