Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Colombia, COVID-19, and the Colonial Trap: Reflections on the Politics of Knowledge Production

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has made historical and contemporary colonial relationships between and within states more fraught. This complexity is apparent within the research process itself, adding a new dimension to debates on positionality and the politics of knowledge production. Drawing on critical approaches to International Relations, and in dialogue with an emerging literature on the implications of the pandemic for knowledge decolonization, we reflect on our experience as scholars from the UK/Ireland researching colonial legacy and Transitional Justice in Colombia. The aim of this autoethnographic article is to suggest how the COVID-19 pandemic affected inequalities between researchers based in Europe and participants in Latin America. Our findings are mixed. While Covid-related funding cuts undermined equity within relationships, the virtual field offered an opportunity to cultivate cooperation between researcher and participant and re-think issues of ethics, voice, and the research agenda itself. Finally, El Maestro Covid taught us valuable lessons on the colonial trap inherent in our endeavors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)106-125
Number of pages20
JournalLatin American Perspectives
Volume52
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s).

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
  2. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • COVID-19
  • Colombia
  • Colonialism
  • Knowledge production
  • Transitional Justice

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Colombia, COVID-19, and the Colonial Trap: Reflections on the Politics of Knowledge Production'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this