Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine relationships among college students' 2 × 2 goal orientations (mastery-approach [MAp], mastery-avoidance [MAv], performance-approach [PAp], performance-avoidance [PAv]), situational motivation (intrinsic motivation, identified regulation, external regulation and amotivation) and effort/persistence in physical activity classes. Participants (140 female, 109 male) completed a battery of questionnaires assessing the outcome variables at the last week of instruction. Regression analyses revealed that MAp and PAp emerged as positive predictors for intrinsic motivation whereas MAp was the only positive predictor for identified regulation. MAp was negatively related to amotivation (AM), while PAp and PAv were positively related to AM. In addition, MAp, PAp, intrinsic motivation, and identified regulation were significant positive predictors of effort/persistence.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 246-260 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Journal of Teaching in Physical Education |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2012 |
Keywords
- And intrinsic motivation
- Mastery-approach
- Mastery-avoidance
- Performance-approach
- Performance-avoidance
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'College students' goal orientations, situational motivation and effort/persistence in physical activity classes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS