Collective Narcissism and Perceptions of the (Il)legitimacy of the 2020 US Election

Christopher M. Federico, Christina Farhart, Joseph Vitriol, Agnieszka Golec De Zavala

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations


Recent work suggests that collective narcissism - an exaggerated, unrealistic belief in an in-group's greatness that demands constant external validation - is a reliable predictor of authoritarian-populist hostility toward democratic norms, processes, and outcomes. In the present study, we use a recent survey of American adults to examine the relationship between collective narcissism and perceptions that the 2020 election in the US was illegitimate. We find evidence that those high in national collective narcissism are more likely to endorse a number of beliefs about the illegitimacy of the 2020 US election, including greater perception of fraud, procedural unfairness, and inaccurate vote counting. Importantly, we find that this relationship is strongest among those whose identities were most threatened by a loss of power due to the 2020 presidential outcome, i.e., Republicans and conservative identifiers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)37-62
Number of pages26
JournalForum (Germany)
Issue number1
StatePublished - Apr 1 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Research Funding: The authors would like to thank the Research Foundation for The State University of New York, the Stony Brook Foundation, Inc., and the College of Arts and Sciences at Stony Brook University for providing the resources needed to collect the data used in this research.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.


  • collective narcissism
  • conspiracy theories
  • election fairness
  • legitimacy


Dive into the research topics of 'Collective Narcissism and Perceptions of the (Il)legitimacy of the 2020 US Election'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this