Cognitive processes in comprehension of science texts

The role of co-activation in confronting misconceptions

Paul van den Broek, Panayiota Kendeou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

139 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the effects of readers' incorrect knowledge on the on-line comprehension processes during reading of science texts, with an eye towards examining the conditions that encourage revision of such knowledge. We employed computational (Landscape Model) and empirical (think-aloud and reading times) methods to compare comprehension processes by readers with correct and incorrect background knowledge, respectively. Science texts were presented in either regular or refutation versions; Prior research using off-line methods suggests that refutation versions promote revision in readers with incorrect knowledge. The results of the current study indicate that incorrect knowledge systematically influences both type and content of processing. Moreover, simultaneous activation of correct and incorrect conceptions during reading plays an essential role in knowledge revision: The computational simulations show that refutation texts create optimal circumstances for co-activation of the incorrect and correct conceptions and the empirical data show that such a co-activation is associated with inconsistency detection and revision activities by the readers with incorrect knowledge. These findings provide insights in the effects of mis-conceptions on the on-line text processing and have important implications for the development of methods for achieving revision during reading.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)335-351
Number of pages17
JournalApplied Cognitive Psychology
Volume22
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2008

Fingerprint

Reading
Cognitive Processes
Misconceptions
Activation
Research
Reader
Conception
Refutation

Cite this

Cognitive processes in comprehension of science texts : The role of co-activation in confronting misconceptions. / van den Broek, Paul; Kendeou, Panayiota.

In: Applied Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 22, No. 3, 01.04.2008, p. 335-351.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{463f1ce0bb2449bea647bddf88a60121,
title = "Cognitive processes in comprehension of science texts: The role of co-activation in confronting misconceptions",
abstract = "In this paper, we investigate the effects of readers' incorrect knowledge on the on-line comprehension processes during reading of science texts, with an eye towards examining the conditions that encourage revision of such knowledge. We employed computational (Landscape Model) and empirical (think-aloud and reading times) methods to compare comprehension processes by readers with correct and incorrect background knowledge, respectively. Science texts were presented in either regular or refutation versions; Prior research using off-line methods suggests that refutation versions promote revision in readers with incorrect knowledge. The results of the current study indicate that incorrect knowledge systematically influences both type and content of processing. Moreover, simultaneous activation of correct and incorrect conceptions during reading plays an essential role in knowledge revision: The computational simulations show that refutation texts create optimal circumstances for co-activation of the incorrect and correct conceptions and the empirical data show that such a co-activation is associated with inconsistency detection and revision activities by the readers with incorrect knowledge. These findings provide insights in the effects of mis-conceptions on the on-line text processing and have important implications for the development of methods for achieving revision during reading.",
author = "{van den Broek}, Paul and Panayiota Kendeou",
year = "2008",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/acp.1418",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "335--351",
journal = "Applied Cognitive Psychology",
issn = "0888-4080",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cognitive processes in comprehension of science texts

T2 - The role of co-activation in confronting misconceptions

AU - van den Broek, Paul

AU - Kendeou, Panayiota

PY - 2008/4/1

Y1 - 2008/4/1

N2 - In this paper, we investigate the effects of readers' incorrect knowledge on the on-line comprehension processes during reading of science texts, with an eye towards examining the conditions that encourage revision of such knowledge. We employed computational (Landscape Model) and empirical (think-aloud and reading times) methods to compare comprehension processes by readers with correct and incorrect background knowledge, respectively. Science texts were presented in either regular or refutation versions; Prior research using off-line methods suggests that refutation versions promote revision in readers with incorrect knowledge. The results of the current study indicate that incorrect knowledge systematically influences both type and content of processing. Moreover, simultaneous activation of correct and incorrect conceptions during reading plays an essential role in knowledge revision: The computational simulations show that refutation texts create optimal circumstances for co-activation of the incorrect and correct conceptions and the empirical data show that such a co-activation is associated with inconsistency detection and revision activities by the readers with incorrect knowledge. These findings provide insights in the effects of mis-conceptions on the on-line text processing and have important implications for the development of methods for achieving revision during reading.

AB - In this paper, we investigate the effects of readers' incorrect knowledge on the on-line comprehension processes during reading of science texts, with an eye towards examining the conditions that encourage revision of such knowledge. We employed computational (Landscape Model) and empirical (think-aloud and reading times) methods to compare comprehension processes by readers with correct and incorrect background knowledge, respectively. Science texts were presented in either regular or refutation versions; Prior research using off-line methods suggests that refutation versions promote revision in readers with incorrect knowledge. The results of the current study indicate that incorrect knowledge systematically influences both type and content of processing. Moreover, simultaneous activation of correct and incorrect conceptions during reading plays an essential role in knowledge revision: The computational simulations show that refutation texts create optimal circumstances for co-activation of the incorrect and correct conceptions and the empirical data show that such a co-activation is associated with inconsistency detection and revision activities by the readers with incorrect knowledge. These findings provide insights in the effects of mis-conceptions on the on-line text processing and have important implications for the development of methods for achieving revision during reading.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=42449145494&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=42449145494&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/acp.1418

DO - 10.1002/acp.1418

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 335

EP - 351

JO - Applied Cognitive Psychology

JF - Applied Cognitive Psychology

SN - 0888-4080

IS - 3

ER -