Cocaine-induced reward enhancement measured with intracranial self-stimulation in rats bred for low versus high saccharin intake

Anna K. Radke, Natalie E. Zlebnik, Nathan A. Holtz, Marilyn E. Carroll

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Rats selectively bred for high (HiS) or low (LoS) saccharin intake are a well-established model of drug-abuse vulnerability, with HiS rats being more likely to consume sweets and cocaine than LoS rats. Still, the nature of these differences is poorly understood. This study examined whether the motivational consequences of cocaine exposure are differentially expressed in HiS and LoS rats by measuring intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) thresholds following acute injections of cocaine (10 mg/kg). Reductions in ICSS thresholds following cocaine injection were greater in HiS rats than in LoS rats, suggesting that the reward-enhancing effects of cocaine are greater in the drugvulnerable HiS than LoS rats. Higher cocaine-induced reward, indicated by lower ICSS thresholds, may explain the higher rates of drug consumption in sweet-preferring animal models, providing a clue to the etiology of cocaine addiction in vulnerable populations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)133-136
Number of pages4
JournalBehavioural Pharmacology
Volume27
Issue number2-3
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2016

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The authors thank Dr Andrew Harris for advice on intracranial self-stimulation and Seth Johnson for superb technical assistance. This research was supported by NIH grant R01 DA003240-28 (M.E.C.).

Publisher Copyright:
© Copyright 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • Cocaine
  • Intracranial self-stimulation
  • Motivation
  • Rat
  • Selective breeding
  • Sweet preference

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cocaine-induced reward enhancement measured with intracranial self-stimulation in rats bred for low versus high saccharin intake'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this