"Cloning" in academe: Mentorship and academic careers

Robert T. Blackburn, David W. Chapman, Susan M. Cameron

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

105 Scopus citations


Mentor professors were surveyed with respect to their most successful "protégés" regarding scholarly production, the mentorship role, and their careers. Career stage, network stratification, and weak-tie theories provided the conceptual frameworks. The 62 mentors were highly productive professors who were predominantly both graduates and employees of research universities. Mentors overwhelmingly nominated as their most successful protégés those whose careers were essentially identical to their own-i.e., their "clones." Women mentors named as most successfully protégés more than twice as many females and males than men did. More productive mentors linked with a greater number of protégés but were less knowledgable about their personal lives, as Granovetter's theory would predict. The results also demonstrate the openness of the network within stratified levels.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)315-327
Number of pages13
JournalResearch in Higher Education
Issue number4
StatePublished - Dec 1981


Dive into the research topics of '"Cloning" in academe: Mentorship and academic careers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this