Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Clinicopathologic features of primary merkel cell carcinoma: A detailed descriptive analysis of a large contemporary cohort

  • Jennifer L. Schwartz
  • , Christopher K. Bichakjian
  • , Lori Lowe
  • , Kent A. Griffith
  • , Marcus L. Frohm
  • , Douglas R. Fullen
  • , James A. Hayman
  • , Christopher D. Lao
  • , Khooshbu S. Shah
  • , Scott A. McLean
  • , Carol R. Bradford
  • , Timothy M. Johnson
  • , Sandra L. Wong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Little uniformity exists in the clinical and histologic variables reported with primary Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). Objective To provide a rigorous descriptive analysis of a contemporary cohort and promote the prospective collection of detailed data on MCC for future outcome studies. Methods and Materials: A detailed descriptive analysis was performed for clinical and histologic features of 147 patients with 150 primary MCC tumors in a prospectively collected database from 2006 to 2010. Results: The majority (73.5%) of patients were at American Joint Committee on Cancer clinical stage I or II at presentation, 20.4% at stage III, and 6.1% at stage IV. Detailed descriptive clinical and histologic findings are presented. Conclusion: Clinical and histologic profiling of primary MCC in the literature is variable and limited. Systematic prospective collection of MCC data is needed for future outcome studies and the ability to compare and share data from multiple sources for this relatively rare tumor.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1009-1016
Number of pages8
JournalDermatologic Surgery
Volume39
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2013
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clinicopathologic features of primary merkel cell carcinoma: A detailed descriptive analysis of a large contemporary cohort'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this