Clinical response decision tree for the mountain gorilla (Gorilla beringeii) as a model for great apes

Michael Cranfield, Lynne Gaffikin, Richard Minnis, Felicia Nutter, Innocent Rwego, Dominic Travis, Christopher Whittier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Disease is one of the main threats to the remaining great ape populations of the world. The decision to intervene in the health of the great apes for population sustainability is controversial. Humans' increasing negative influence on great ape health has mandated the reevaluation of current management policies. The Mountain Gorilla Veterinary Project (MGVP) has been making health intervention decisions since 1986. The decision to intervene has often been made subjectively due to poorly defined criteria that are often influenced by emotion. This paper provides a consistent framework for evidence-based health intervention decision-making. The decision tree is a five-tier process consisting of routine sentinel health observation, intensive follow-up veterinary health observation, outbreak assessment, risk assessment, and risk management. Although this paper focuses on the mountain gorillas, it serves as a basis for evidence-based decision-making in other species.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)909-927
Number of pages19
JournalAmerican Journal of Primatology
Volume68
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2006

Fingerprint

Gorilla gorilla
Pongidae
Gorilla
mountains
mountain
decision making
risk management
emotions
risk assessment
decision
health
sustainability

Keywords

  • Evidence-based decision-making
  • Health intervention
  • Mountain gorilla

Cite this

Clinical response decision tree for the mountain gorilla (Gorilla beringeii) as a model for great apes. / Cranfield, Michael; Gaffikin, Lynne; Minnis, Richard; Nutter, Felicia; Rwego, Innocent; Travis, Dominic; Whittier, Christopher.

In: American Journal of Primatology, Vol. 68, No. 9, 01.09.2006, p. 909-927.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cranfield, Michael ; Gaffikin, Lynne ; Minnis, Richard ; Nutter, Felicia ; Rwego, Innocent ; Travis, Dominic ; Whittier, Christopher. / Clinical response decision tree for the mountain gorilla (Gorilla beringeii) as a model for great apes. In: American Journal of Primatology. 2006 ; Vol. 68, No. 9. pp. 909-927.
@article{49c55af89bea4d55a0d6c0009cce0206,
title = "Clinical response decision tree for the mountain gorilla (Gorilla beringeii) as a model for great apes",
abstract = "Disease is one of the main threats to the remaining great ape populations of the world. The decision to intervene in the health of the great apes for population sustainability is controversial. Humans' increasing negative influence on great ape health has mandated the reevaluation of current management policies. The Mountain Gorilla Veterinary Project (MGVP) has been making health intervention decisions since 1986. The decision to intervene has often been made subjectively due to poorly defined criteria that are often influenced by emotion. This paper provides a consistent framework for evidence-based health intervention decision-making. The decision tree is a five-tier process consisting of routine sentinel health observation, intensive follow-up veterinary health observation, outbreak assessment, risk assessment, and risk management. Although this paper focuses on the mountain gorillas, it serves as a basis for evidence-based decision-making in other species.",
keywords = "Evidence-based decision-making, Health intervention, Mountain gorilla",
author = "Michael Cranfield and Lynne Gaffikin and Richard Minnis and Felicia Nutter and Innocent Rwego and Dominic Travis and Christopher Whittier",
year = "2006",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/ajp.20297",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "68",
pages = "909--927",
journal = "American Journal of Primatology",
issn = "0275-2565",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical response decision tree for the mountain gorilla (Gorilla beringeii) as a model for great apes

AU - Cranfield, Michael

AU - Gaffikin, Lynne

AU - Minnis, Richard

AU - Nutter, Felicia

AU - Rwego, Innocent

AU - Travis, Dominic

AU - Whittier, Christopher

PY - 2006/9/1

Y1 - 2006/9/1

N2 - Disease is one of the main threats to the remaining great ape populations of the world. The decision to intervene in the health of the great apes for population sustainability is controversial. Humans' increasing negative influence on great ape health has mandated the reevaluation of current management policies. The Mountain Gorilla Veterinary Project (MGVP) has been making health intervention decisions since 1986. The decision to intervene has often been made subjectively due to poorly defined criteria that are often influenced by emotion. This paper provides a consistent framework for evidence-based health intervention decision-making. The decision tree is a five-tier process consisting of routine sentinel health observation, intensive follow-up veterinary health observation, outbreak assessment, risk assessment, and risk management. Although this paper focuses on the mountain gorillas, it serves as a basis for evidence-based decision-making in other species.

AB - Disease is one of the main threats to the remaining great ape populations of the world. The decision to intervene in the health of the great apes for population sustainability is controversial. Humans' increasing negative influence on great ape health has mandated the reevaluation of current management policies. The Mountain Gorilla Veterinary Project (MGVP) has been making health intervention decisions since 1986. The decision to intervene has often been made subjectively due to poorly defined criteria that are often influenced by emotion. This paper provides a consistent framework for evidence-based health intervention decision-making. The decision tree is a five-tier process consisting of routine sentinel health observation, intensive follow-up veterinary health observation, outbreak assessment, risk assessment, and risk management. Although this paper focuses on the mountain gorillas, it serves as a basis for evidence-based decision-making in other species.

KW - Evidence-based decision-making

KW - Health intervention

KW - Mountain gorilla

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33748337297&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33748337297&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ajp.20297

DO - 10.1002/ajp.20297

M3 - Article

VL - 68

SP - 909

EP - 927

JO - American Journal of Primatology

JF - American Journal of Primatology

SN - 0275-2565

IS - 9

ER -