Clinical importance of non-participation in a maximal graded exercise test on risk of non-fatal and fatal cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality: CARDIA study

Kelley Pettee Gabriel, Kara M. Whitaker, Daniel Duprez, Barbara Sternfeld, Cora E. Lewis, Steve Sidney, Gregory Knell, David R. Jacobs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

While poor performance during a maximal graded exercise test (GXT) predicts cardiovascular events and premature mortality, the potential clinical importance of non-participation in a GXT, either for medical or non-medical reasons, is currently unknown. Data are from 4086 and 3547 Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) participants who attended the Year 7 (ages 25–37 years) and/or 20 exams (ages 38–50 years), respectively, which included a GXT. Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine the effect of GXT disposition (at Year 7 and 20, separately) on risk of non-fatal and fatal cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality obtained through 28 years of follow-up. A GXT was not conducted or completed according to protocol in 12.9% and 19.1% of participants attending the Year 7 and 20 exams, respectively. After adjustment, participants who missed the Year 20 GXT for medical reasons had a higher risk of cardiovascular events [HR: 4.06 (95% CI: 1.43, 11.5)] and all-cause mortality [HR: 3.07 (95% CI: 1.11, 12.3)] compared to GXT completers; participants who missed at Year 20 for non-medical reasons also had higher risk of all-cause mortality [HR: 2.53 (95% CI: 1.61, 3.99)]. Findings suggest that non-participation in a GXT, regardless of medical or non-medical reason, to be an important predictor of excess risk of adverse health outcomes and premature mortality. Additional patient follow-up, including identification of potential targets for intervention (e.g., weight management and smoking cessation programs), should be conducted at the point of a missed GXT.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)137-144
Number of pages8
JournalPreventive medicine
Volume106
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2018

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Study (CARDIA) is supported by contracts HHSN268201300025C, HHSN268201300026C, HHSN268201300027C, HHSN268201300028C, HHSN268201300029C, and HHSN268200900041C from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), the Intramural Research Program of the National Institute on Aging (NIA), and an intra-agency agreement between NIA and NHLBI (AG0005). Additional support for this work was provided by the CARDIA Fitness Study (R01 HL078972 to BS & SS) and CARDIA Activity Study (R56 HL125423 to KPG, BS/SS).

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Inc.

Copyright:
Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • Adverse events
  • Cardiorespiratory fitness
  • Cohort studies
  • Risk prediction

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical importance of non-participation in a maximal graded exercise test on risk of non-fatal and fatal cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality: CARDIA study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this