TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass-ionomer liner for cervical dentin hypersensitivity treatment
AU - Tantbirojn, Daranee
AU - Poolthong, Suchit
AU - Leevailoj, Chalermpol
AU - Srisawasdi, Sirivimol
AU - Hodges, James S.
AU - Randall, Ros C.
PY - 2006/2/1
Y1 - 2006/2/1
N2 - Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of two agents for treating cervical dentin sensitivity associated with gingival recession or noncarious cervical lesions. Methods: 44 patients with at least mild sensitivity affecting cervical dentin were enrolled in a longitudinal randomized clinical trial. A resin-based desensitizer or an experimental glass-ionomer was assigned to treat at most two teeth from each side of the mouth. Sensitivity was assessed by tactile and cold tests, measured with a Visual Analogue Scale at baseline, after treatment, and at 1 week, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment. Other noteworthy clinical observations were recorded. Results: Both treatments effectively reduced dentin sensitivity (mixed linear model analysis). Sensitivity score for the glass-ionomer was significantly lower than for the resin-based desensitizer after treatment and at all follow-up periods (P< 0.0001). Some overhanging margins were observed in the glass-ionomer group, which could accumulate plaque and cause gingivitis. Despite material loss from some teeth treated with the glass-ionomer, the follow-up sensitivity scores were still lower than baseline scores.
AB - Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of two agents for treating cervical dentin sensitivity associated with gingival recession or noncarious cervical lesions. Methods: 44 patients with at least mild sensitivity affecting cervical dentin were enrolled in a longitudinal randomized clinical trial. A resin-based desensitizer or an experimental glass-ionomer was assigned to treat at most two teeth from each side of the mouth. Sensitivity was assessed by tactile and cold tests, measured with a Visual Analogue Scale at baseline, after treatment, and at 1 week, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment. Other noteworthy clinical observations were recorded. Results: Both treatments effectively reduced dentin sensitivity (mixed linear model analysis). Sensitivity score for the glass-ionomer was significantly lower than for the resin-based desensitizer after treatment and at all follow-up periods (P< 0.0001). Some overhanging margins were observed in the glass-ionomer group, which could accumulate plaque and cause gingivitis. Despite material loss from some teeth treated with the glass-ionomer, the follow-up sensitivity scores were still lower than baseline scores.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33645499697&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33645499697&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 16555659
AN - SCOPUS:33645499697
SN - 0894-8275
VL - 19
SP - 56
EP - 60
JO - American Journal of Dentistry
JF - American Journal of Dentistry
IS - 1
ER -