Clinical evaluation of a low-shrinkage composite in posterior restorations: One-year results

B. Baracco, J. Perdigão, E. Cabrera, I. Giráldez, L. Ceballos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

41 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the one-year clinical performance of three restorative systems, which included a novel low-shrinkage composite and two bonding strategies. Materials and Methods: Twenty-five patients received three Class I (occlusal) or Class II restorations performed with one of three restorative systems: Filtek Silorane Restorative System (FS); Adper Scotchbond 1 XT, a twostep etch-and-rinse adhesive, with Filtek Z250 (XT); and Adper Scotchbond SE, a two-step self-etch adhesive, with Filtek Z250 (SE). All materials were applied following the manufacturer's instructions. Two independent observers evaluated the restorations at baseline, after six months, and after one year, according to the United States Public Health System modified criteria. The Kruskal-Wallis test and the Mann-Whitney U-test were computed to compare the behavior of the restorative systems; Friedman and Wilcoxon tests were used to analyze the intrasystem data (α=0.05). Results: All restorations were evaluated at one year. FS and XT performed statistically similarly at one year, but marginal staining for SE was statistically worse. Intrasystem comparisons between baseline and one year also showed deterioration of marginal staining for SE, while a deterioration of the marginal adaptation was recorded for both SE and FS. XT was the only system for which there was no statistical change of the parameters measured in this study. Conclusions: Both restorative systems using self-etch adhesives showed a tendency to degradation of marginal adaptation after one year of clinical use, compared to baseline values. Although the clinical performance of FS was deemed acceptable after one year, this study did not find any advantage of the siloranebased composite over the methacrylate-based composite. The low-shrinkage associated with FS may not be a determinant factor for clinical success.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)117-129
Number of pages13
JournalOperative dentistry
Volume37
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2012

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical evaluation of a low-shrinkage composite in posterior restorations: One-year results'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this