Clinical evaluation of a low-shrinkage composite in posterior restorations

One-year results

B. Baracco, Jorge Perdigao, E. Cabrera, I. Giráldez, L. Ceballos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the one-year clinical performance of three restorative systems, which included a novel low-shrinkage composite and two bonding strategies. Materials and Methods: Twenty-five patients received three Class I (occlusal) or Class II restorations performed with one of three restorative systems: Filtek Silorane Restorative System (FS); Adper Scotchbond 1 XT, a twostep etch-and-rinse adhesive, with Filtek Z250 (XT); and Adper Scotchbond SE, a two-step self-etch adhesive, with Filtek Z250 (SE). All materials were applied following the manufacturer's instructions. Two independent observers evaluated the restorations at baseline, after six months, and after one year, according to the United States Public Health System modified criteria. The Kruskal-Wallis test and the Mann-Whitney U-test were computed to compare the behavior of the restorative systems; Friedman and Wilcoxon tests were used to analyze the intrasystem data (α=0.05). Results: All restorations were evaluated at one year. FS and XT performed statistically similarly at one year, but marginal staining for SE was statistically worse. Intrasystem comparisons between baseline and one year also showed deterioration of marginal staining for SE, while a deterioration of the marginal adaptation was recorded for both SE and FS. XT was the only system for which there was no statistical change of the parameters measured in this study. Conclusions: Both restorative systems using self-etch adhesives showed a tendency to degradation of marginal adaptation after one year of clinical use, compared to baseline values. Although the clinical performance of FS was deemed acceptable after one year, this study did not find any advantage of the siloranebased composite over the methacrylate-based composite. The low-shrinkage associated with FS may not be a determinant factor for clinical success.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)117-129
Number of pages13
JournalOperative Dentistry
Volume37
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2012

Fingerprint

Adhesives
Staining and Labeling
Methacrylates
Nonparametric Statistics
Public Health
Scotchbond
Filtek Z250
silorane composite resin

Cite this

Clinical evaluation of a low-shrinkage composite in posterior restorations : One-year results. / Baracco, B.; Perdigao, Jorge; Cabrera, E.; Giráldez, I.; Ceballos, L.

In: Operative Dentistry, Vol. 37, No. 2, 01.03.2012, p. 117-129.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Baracco, B. ; Perdigao, Jorge ; Cabrera, E. ; Giráldez, I. ; Ceballos, L. / Clinical evaluation of a low-shrinkage composite in posterior restorations : One-year results. In: Operative Dentistry. 2012 ; Vol. 37, No. 2. pp. 117-129.
@article{5b42392ef9e04ed694abed0d07f831cb,
title = "Clinical evaluation of a low-shrinkage composite in posterior restorations: One-year results",
abstract = "Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the one-year clinical performance of three restorative systems, which included a novel low-shrinkage composite and two bonding strategies. Materials and Methods: Twenty-five patients received three Class I (occlusal) or Class II restorations performed with one of three restorative systems: Filtek Silorane Restorative System (FS); Adper Scotchbond 1 XT, a twostep etch-and-rinse adhesive, with Filtek Z250 (XT); and Adper Scotchbond SE, a two-step self-etch adhesive, with Filtek Z250 (SE). All materials were applied following the manufacturer's instructions. Two independent observers evaluated the restorations at baseline, after six months, and after one year, according to the United States Public Health System modified criteria. The Kruskal-Wallis test and the Mann-Whitney U-test were computed to compare the behavior of the restorative systems; Friedman and Wilcoxon tests were used to analyze the intrasystem data (α=0.05). Results: All restorations were evaluated at one year. FS and XT performed statistically similarly at one year, but marginal staining for SE was statistically worse. Intrasystem comparisons between baseline and one year also showed deterioration of marginal staining for SE, while a deterioration of the marginal adaptation was recorded for both SE and FS. XT was the only system for which there was no statistical change of the parameters measured in this study. Conclusions: Both restorative systems using self-etch adhesives showed a tendency to degradation of marginal adaptation after one year of clinical use, compared to baseline values. Although the clinical performance of FS was deemed acceptable after one year, this study did not find any advantage of the siloranebased composite over the methacrylate-based composite. The low-shrinkage associated with FS may not be a determinant factor for clinical success.",
author = "B. Baracco and Jorge Perdigao and E. Cabrera and I. Gir{\'a}ldez and L. Ceballos",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2341/11-179-C",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "117--129",
journal = "Operative Dentistry",
issn = "0361-7734",
publisher = "Indiana University School of Dentistry",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical evaluation of a low-shrinkage composite in posterior restorations

T2 - One-year results

AU - Baracco, B.

AU - Perdigao, Jorge

AU - Cabrera, E.

AU - Giráldez, I.

AU - Ceballos, L.

PY - 2012/3/1

Y1 - 2012/3/1

N2 - Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the one-year clinical performance of three restorative systems, which included a novel low-shrinkage composite and two bonding strategies. Materials and Methods: Twenty-five patients received three Class I (occlusal) or Class II restorations performed with one of three restorative systems: Filtek Silorane Restorative System (FS); Adper Scotchbond 1 XT, a twostep etch-and-rinse adhesive, with Filtek Z250 (XT); and Adper Scotchbond SE, a two-step self-etch adhesive, with Filtek Z250 (SE). All materials were applied following the manufacturer's instructions. Two independent observers evaluated the restorations at baseline, after six months, and after one year, according to the United States Public Health System modified criteria. The Kruskal-Wallis test and the Mann-Whitney U-test were computed to compare the behavior of the restorative systems; Friedman and Wilcoxon tests were used to analyze the intrasystem data (α=0.05). Results: All restorations were evaluated at one year. FS and XT performed statistically similarly at one year, but marginal staining for SE was statistically worse. Intrasystem comparisons between baseline and one year also showed deterioration of marginal staining for SE, while a deterioration of the marginal adaptation was recorded for both SE and FS. XT was the only system for which there was no statistical change of the parameters measured in this study. Conclusions: Both restorative systems using self-etch adhesives showed a tendency to degradation of marginal adaptation after one year of clinical use, compared to baseline values. Although the clinical performance of FS was deemed acceptable after one year, this study did not find any advantage of the siloranebased composite over the methacrylate-based composite. The low-shrinkage associated with FS may not be a determinant factor for clinical success.

AB - Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the one-year clinical performance of three restorative systems, which included a novel low-shrinkage composite and two bonding strategies. Materials and Methods: Twenty-five patients received three Class I (occlusal) or Class II restorations performed with one of three restorative systems: Filtek Silorane Restorative System (FS); Adper Scotchbond 1 XT, a twostep etch-and-rinse adhesive, with Filtek Z250 (XT); and Adper Scotchbond SE, a two-step self-etch adhesive, with Filtek Z250 (SE). All materials were applied following the manufacturer's instructions. Two independent observers evaluated the restorations at baseline, after six months, and after one year, according to the United States Public Health System modified criteria. The Kruskal-Wallis test and the Mann-Whitney U-test were computed to compare the behavior of the restorative systems; Friedman and Wilcoxon tests were used to analyze the intrasystem data (α=0.05). Results: All restorations were evaluated at one year. FS and XT performed statistically similarly at one year, but marginal staining for SE was statistically worse. Intrasystem comparisons between baseline and one year also showed deterioration of marginal staining for SE, while a deterioration of the marginal adaptation was recorded for both SE and FS. XT was the only system for which there was no statistical change of the parameters measured in this study. Conclusions: Both restorative systems using self-etch adhesives showed a tendency to degradation of marginal adaptation after one year of clinical use, compared to baseline values. Although the clinical performance of FS was deemed acceptable after one year, this study did not find any advantage of the siloranebased composite over the methacrylate-based composite. The low-shrinkage associated with FS may not be a determinant factor for clinical success.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860833242&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84860833242&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2341/11-179-C

DO - 10.2341/11-179-C

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 117

EP - 129

JO - Operative Dentistry

JF - Operative Dentistry

SN - 0361-7734

IS - 2

ER -