TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Radiomics-Based Survival Prediction in Glioblastoma Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging
AU - Bathla, Girish
AU - Soni, Neetu
AU - Ward, Caitlin
AU - Pillenahalli Maheshwarappa, Ravishankar
AU - Agarwal, Amit
AU - Priya, Sarv
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023/11/1
Y1 - 2023/11/1
N2 - Introduction Survival prediction in glioblastoma remains challenging, and identification of robust imaging markers could help with this relevant clinical problem. We evaluated multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-derived radiomics to assess prediction of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Methodology A retrospective, institutional review board-approved study was performed. There were 93 eligible patients, of which 55 underwent gross tumor resection and chemoradiation (GTR-CR). Overall survival and PFS were assessed in the entire cohort and the GTR-CR cohort using multiple machine learning pipelines. A model based on multiple clinical variables was also developed. Survival prediction was assessed using the radiomics-only, clinical-only, and the radiomics and clinical combined models. Results For all patients combined, the clinical feature-derived model outperformed the best radiomics model for both OS (C-index, 0.706 vs 0.597; P < 0.0001) and PFS prediction (C-index, 0.675 vs 0.588; P < 0.001). Within the GTR-CR cohort, the radiomics model showed nonstatistically improved performance over the clinical model for predicting OS (C-index, 0.638 vs 0.588; P = 0.4). However, the radiomics model outperformed the clinical feature model for predicting PFS in GTR-CR cohort (C-index, 0.641 vs 0.550; P = 0.004). Combined clinical and radiomics model did not yield superior prediction when compared with the best model in each case. Conclusions When considering all patients, regardless of therapy, the radiomics-derived prediction of OS and PFS is inferior to that from a model derived from clinical features alone. However, in patients with GTR-CR, radiomics-only model outperforms clinical feature-derived model for predicting PFS.
AB - Introduction Survival prediction in glioblastoma remains challenging, and identification of robust imaging markers could help with this relevant clinical problem. We evaluated multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-derived radiomics to assess prediction of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Methodology A retrospective, institutional review board-approved study was performed. There were 93 eligible patients, of which 55 underwent gross tumor resection and chemoradiation (GTR-CR). Overall survival and PFS were assessed in the entire cohort and the GTR-CR cohort using multiple machine learning pipelines. A model based on multiple clinical variables was also developed. Survival prediction was assessed using the radiomics-only, clinical-only, and the radiomics and clinical combined models. Results For all patients combined, the clinical feature-derived model outperformed the best radiomics model for both OS (C-index, 0.706 vs 0.597; P < 0.0001) and PFS prediction (C-index, 0.675 vs 0.588; P < 0.001). Within the GTR-CR cohort, the radiomics model showed nonstatistically improved performance over the clinical model for predicting OS (C-index, 0.638 vs 0.588; P = 0.4). However, the radiomics model outperformed the clinical feature model for predicting PFS in GTR-CR cohort (C-index, 0.641 vs 0.550; P = 0.004). Combined clinical and radiomics model did not yield superior prediction when compared with the best model in each case. Conclusions When considering all patients, regardless of therapy, the radiomics-derived prediction of OS and PFS is inferior to that from a model derived from clinical features alone. However, in patients with GTR-CR, radiomics-only model outperforms clinical feature-derived model for predicting PFS.
KW - MRI
KW - glioblastoma
KW - radiomics
KW - survival
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85176397194&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85176397194&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/RCT.0000000000001493
DO - 10.1097/RCT.0000000000001493
M3 - Article
C2 - 37948367
AN - SCOPUS:85176397194
SN - 0363-8715
VL - 47
SP - 919
EP - 923
JO - Journal of computer assisted tomography
JF - Journal of computer assisted tomography
IS - 6
ER -