Climate change adaptation in the world's best places

A wicked problem in need of immediate attention

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Natural World Heritage (WH) sites are globally recognized as having universal value, providing society with critical ecosystem services like biodiversity, clean water, and recreational opportunity. Every natural WH site is at risk from climate change, but the scope and nature of that risk varies widely. Climate change adaptation is a wicked problem; that is, there are no clear-cut solutions and stakeholders at each site disagree on values, norms and first steps, making adaptation difficult. Yet, delaying action poses more risks than taking action under uncertainty. I synthesize the refereed literature relevant to climate adaptation for natural WH sites. I argue that adaptation should be ecosystem based. It should begin by understanding linkages among site attributes and the surrounding landscape, and asking how off-site and on-site practices might reduce risk of negative effects of climate change on those attributes. Adaptation responses are tiered. Fine-scale, on-site responses are less expensive and easier but will have less impact than coarse-scale responses involving the surrounding community. We cannot precisely predict future conditions so we must act adaptively, designing responses, acting, evaluating results, re-designing and trying again. Action is constrained by institutional mandates focused on preserving existing conditions rather than recognizing a dynamic future. Climate change adaptation at natural WH sites should be Adaptive, Participatory and Transformative, deployed through clumsy solutions. Such solutions will require strong leadership and excellent communication, drawing together widely disparate views and iterative practices focusing on resilience. That requirement establishes the need for capacity development for climate change adaptation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-11
Number of pages11
JournalLandscape and Urban Planning
Volume133
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

World Heritage Site
climate change
ecosystem service
leadership
stakeholder
communication
biodiversity
world
need
climate change adaptation
ecosystem
climate
water
attribute

Keywords

  • APT (Adaptive
  • Climate change adaptation
  • Clumsy solutions
  • Natural World Heritage
  • Participative
  • Protected areas
  • Transdisciplinary)
  • Wicked problems

Cite this

Climate change adaptation in the world's best places : A wicked problem in need of immediate attention. / Perry, Jim A.

In: Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 133, 01.01.2015, p. 1-11.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{f84f4fe73bfc4d29b4be537fd856425c,
title = "Climate change adaptation in the world's best places: A wicked problem in need of immediate attention",
abstract = "Natural World Heritage (WH) sites are globally recognized as having universal value, providing society with critical ecosystem services like biodiversity, clean water, and recreational opportunity. Every natural WH site is at risk from climate change, but the scope and nature of that risk varies widely. Climate change adaptation is a wicked problem; that is, there are no clear-cut solutions and stakeholders at each site disagree on values, norms and first steps, making adaptation difficult. Yet, delaying action poses more risks than taking action under uncertainty. I synthesize the refereed literature relevant to climate adaptation for natural WH sites. I argue that adaptation should be ecosystem based. It should begin by understanding linkages among site attributes and the surrounding landscape, and asking how off-site and on-site practices might reduce risk of negative effects of climate change on those attributes. Adaptation responses are tiered. Fine-scale, on-site responses are less expensive and easier but will have less impact than coarse-scale responses involving the surrounding community. We cannot precisely predict future conditions so we must act adaptively, designing responses, acting, evaluating results, re-designing and trying again. Action is constrained by institutional mandates focused on preserving existing conditions rather than recognizing a dynamic future. Climate change adaptation at natural WH sites should be Adaptive, Participatory and Transformative, deployed through clumsy solutions. Such solutions will require strong leadership and excellent communication, drawing together widely disparate views and iterative practices focusing on resilience. That requirement establishes the need for capacity development for climate change adaptation.",
keywords = "APT (Adaptive, Climate change adaptation, Clumsy solutions, Natural World Heritage, Participative, Protected areas, Transdisciplinary), Wicked problems",
author = "Perry, {Jim A}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.08.013",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "133",
pages = "1--11",
journal = "Landscape and Urban Planning",
issn = "0169-2046",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Climate change adaptation in the world's best places

T2 - A wicked problem in need of immediate attention

AU - Perry, Jim A

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Natural World Heritage (WH) sites are globally recognized as having universal value, providing society with critical ecosystem services like biodiversity, clean water, and recreational opportunity. Every natural WH site is at risk from climate change, but the scope and nature of that risk varies widely. Climate change adaptation is a wicked problem; that is, there are no clear-cut solutions and stakeholders at each site disagree on values, norms and first steps, making adaptation difficult. Yet, delaying action poses more risks than taking action under uncertainty. I synthesize the refereed literature relevant to climate adaptation for natural WH sites. I argue that adaptation should be ecosystem based. It should begin by understanding linkages among site attributes and the surrounding landscape, and asking how off-site and on-site practices might reduce risk of negative effects of climate change on those attributes. Adaptation responses are tiered. Fine-scale, on-site responses are less expensive and easier but will have less impact than coarse-scale responses involving the surrounding community. We cannot precisely predict future conditions so we must act adaptively, designing responses, acting, evaluating results, re-designing and trying again. Action is constrained by institutional mandates focused on preserving existing conditions rather than recognizing a dynamic future. Climate change adaptation at natural WH sites should be Adaptive, Participatory and Transformative, deployed through clumsy solutions. Such solutions will require strong leadership and excellent communication, drawing together widely disparate views and iterative practices focusing on resilience. That requirement establishes the need for capacity development for climate change adaptation.

AB - Natural World Heritage (WH) sites are globally recognized as having universal value, providing society with critical ecosystem services like biodiversity, clean water, and recreational opportunity. Every natural WH site is at risk from climate change, but the scope and nature of that risk varies widely. Climate change adaptation is a wicked problem; that is, there are no clear-cut solutions and stakeholders at each site disagree on values, norms and first steps, making adaptation difficult. Yet, delaying action poses more risks than taking action under uncertainty. I synthesize the refereed literature relevant to climate adaptation for natural WH sites. I argue that adaptation should be ecosystem based. It should begin by understanding linkages among site attributes and the surrounding landscape, and asking how off-site and on-site practices might reduce risk of negative effects of climate change on those attributes. Adaptation responses are tiered. Fine-scale, on-site responses are less expensive and easier but will have less impact than coarse-scale responses involving the surrounding community. We cannot precisely predict future conditions so we must act adaptively, designing responses, acting, evaluating results, re-designing and trying again. Action is constrained by institutional mandates focused on preserving existing conditions rather than recognizing a dynamic future. Climate change adaptation at natural WH sites should be Adaptive, Participatory and Transformative, deployed through clumsy solutions. Such solutions will require strong leadership and excellent communication, drawing together widely disparate views and iterative practices focusing on resilience. That requirement establishes the need for capacity development for climate change adaptation.

KW - APT (Adaptive

KW - Climate change adaptation

KW - Clumsy solutions

KW - Natural World Heritage

KW - Participative

KW - Protected areas

KW - Transdisciplinary)

KW - Wicked problems

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84907701054&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84907701054&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.08.013

DO - 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.08.013

M3 - Review article

VL - 133

SP - 1

EP - 11

JO - Landscape and Urban Planning

JF - Landscape and Urban Planning

SN - 0169-2046

ER -