Circumstances of bat encounters and knowledge of rabies among Minnesota residents submitting bats for rabies testing

Alicia L. Liesener, Kirk E. Smith, Rolan D. Davis, Jeff B Bender, Richard N. Danila, David F. Neitzel, Gerda E. Nordquist, Sandra R. Forsman, Joni M. Scheftel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Minnesota residents who submitted a bat to the Minnesota Department of Health for rabies testing in 2003 were surveyed by telephone regarding the circumstances of the bat encounter and their knowledge of bats and rabies. Of 442 bats submitted for testing, 12 (3%) tested positive for rabies, and 410 (93%) tested negative; 17 (4%) bats were unsuitable for testing, and three (1%) had equivocal results. A case-control study found that rabid bats were more likely than non-rabid bats to be found in September, found outside, found in a wooded area, unable to fly, acting ill, or acting aggressively. Rabid bats were not more likely than non-rabid bats to be found during the day or to have bitten someone. While most persons submitting bats for rabies testing were aware that bats can carry rabies, few knew they should submit the bat for testing until they sought the advice of an animal control officer, veterinarian, or healthcare provider.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)208-215
Number of pages8
JournalVector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases
Volume6
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2006

Fingerprint

Rabies
Veterinarians
Telephone
Health Personnel
Case-Control Studies

Keywords

  • Bats
  • Minnesota
  • Rabies
  • Rabies exposures

Cite this

Circumstances of bat encounters and knowledge of rabies among Minnesota residents submitting bats for rabies testing. / Liesener, Alicia L.; Smith, Kirk E.; Davis, Rolan D.; Bender, Jeff B; Danila, Richard N.; Neitzel, David F.; Nordquist, Gerda E.; Forsman, Sandra R.; Scheftel, Joni M.

In: Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases, Vol. 6, No. 2, 01.06.2006, p. 208-215.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Liesener, AL, Smith, KE, Davis, RD, Bender, JB, Danila, RN, Neitzel, DF, Nordquist, GE, Forsman, SR & Scheftel, JM 2006, 'Circumstances of bat encounters and knowledge of rabies among Minnesota residents submitting bats for rabies testing', Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 208-215. https://doi.org/10.1089/vbz.2006.6.208
Liesener, Alicia L. ; Smith, Kirk E. ; Davis, Rolan D. ; Bender, Jeff B ; Danila, Richard N. ; Neitzel, David F. ; Nordquist, Gerda E. ; Forsman, Sandra R. ; Scheftel, Joni M. / Circumstances of bat encounters and knowledge of rabies among Minnesota residents submitting bats for rabies testing. In: Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases. 2006 ; Vol. 6, No. 2. pp. 208-215.
@article{759fc6450aa84326a444f36c9b3c0d61,
title = "Circumstances of bat encounters and knowledge of rabies among Minnesota residents submitting bats for rabies testing",
abstract = "Minnesota residents who submitted a bat to the Minnesota Department of Health for rabies testing in 2003 were surveyed by telephone regarding the circumstances of the bat encounter and their knowledge of bats and rabies. Of 442 bats submitted for testing, 12 (3{\%}) tested positive for rabies, and 410 (93{\%}) tested negative; 17 (4{\%}) bats were unsuitable for testing, and three (1{\%}) had equivocal results. A case-control study found that rabid bats were more likely than non-rabid bats to be found in September, found outside, found in a wooded area, unable to fly, acting ill, or acting aggressively. Rabid bats were not more likely than non-rabid bats to be found during the day or to have bitten someone. While most persons submitting bats for rabies testing were aware that bats can carry rabies, few knew they should submit the bat for testing until they sought the advice of an animal control officer, veterinarian, or healthcare provider.",
keywords = "Bats, Minnesota, Rabies, Rabies exposures",
author = "Liesener, {Alicia L.} and Smith, {Kirk E.} and Davis, {Rolan D.} and Bender, {Jeff B} and Danila, {Richard N.} and Neitzel, {David F.} and Nordquist, {Gerda E.} and Forsman, {Sandra R.} and Scheftel, {Joni M.}",
year = "2006",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/vbz.2006.6.208",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "208--215",
journal = "Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases",
issn = "1530-3667",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Circumstances of bat encounters and knowledge of rabies among Minnesota residents submitting bats for rabies testing

AU - Liesener, Alicia L.

AU - Smith, Kirk E.

AU - Davis, Rolan D.

AU - Bender, Jeff B

AU - Danila, Richard N.

AU - Neitzel, David F.

AU - Nordquist, Gerda E.

AU - Forsman, Sandra R.

AU - Scheftel, Joni M.

PY - 2006/6/1

Y1 - 2006/6/1

N2 - Minnesota residents who submitted a bat to the Minnesota Department of Health for rabies testing in 2003 were surveyed by telephone regarding the circumstances of the bat encounter and their knowledge of bats and rabies. Of 442 bats submitted for testing, 12 (3%) tested positive for rabies, and 410 (93%) tested negative; 17 (4%) bats were unsuitable for testing, and three (1%) had equivocal results. A case-control study found that rabid bats were more likely than non-rabid bats to be found in September, found outside, found in a wooded area, unable to fly, acting ill, or acting aggressively. Rabid bats were not more likely than non-rabid bats to be found during the day or to have bitten someone. While most persons submitting bats for rabies testing were aware that bats can carry rabies, few knew they should submit the bat for testing until they sought the advice of an animal control officer, veterinarian, or healthcare provider.

AB - Minnesota residents who submitted a bat to the Minnesota Department of Health for rabies testing in 2003 were surveyed by telephone regarding the circumstances of the bat encounter and their knowledge of bats and rabies. Of 442 bats submitted for testing, 12 (3%) tested positive for rabies, and 410 (93%) tested negative; 17 (4%) bats were unsuitable for testing, and three (1%) had equivocal results. A case-control study found that rabid bats were more likely than non-rabid bats to be found in September, found outside, found in a wooded area, unable to fly, acting ill, or acting aggressively. Rabid bats were not more likely than non-rabid bats to be found during the day or to have bitten someone. While most persons submitting bats for rabies testing were aware that bats can carry rabies, few knew they should submit the bat for testing until they sought the advice of an animal control officer, veterinarian, or healthcare provider.

KW - Bats

KW - Minnesota

KW - Rabies

KW - Rabies exposures

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33746148461&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33746148461&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/vbz.2006.6.208

DO - 10.1089/vbz.2006.6.208

M3 - Article

C2 - 16796518

AN - SCOPUS:33746148461

VL - 6

SP - 208

EP - 215

JO - Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases

JF - Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases

SN - 1530-3667

IS - 2

ER -