Circadian response of annual weeds to glyphosate and glufosinate

Krishona B. Martinson, Robert B. Sothern, Willard L. Oukkari, Beverly R. Durgan, Jeffrey L. Gunsolus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Scopus citations


Five field experiments were conducted in 1998 and 1999 in Minnesota to examine the influence of time of day efficacy of glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine] and glufosinate [2-amino-4-(hydroxymethyl-phosphinyl)-butanoic acid] applications on the control of annual weeds. Each experiment was designed to be a randomized complete block with four replications using plot sizes of 3 × 9 m. Glyphosate and glufosinate were applied at rates of 0.421 kg ae/ha and 0.292 kg ai/ha, respectively, with and without an additional adjuvant that consisted of 20% nonionic surfactant and 80% ammonium sulfate. All treatments were applied with water at 94 L/ha. Times of day for the application of herbicide were 06:00h, 09:00h, 12:00h, 15:00h, 18:00h, 21:00h, and 24:00h. Efficacy was evaluated 14 d after application by visual ratings. At 14 d, a circadian response to each herbicide was found, with greatest annual weed control observed with an application occurring between 09:00h and 18:00h and significantly less weed control observed with an application at 06:00h, 21:00h, or 24:00h. The addition of an adjuvant to both herbicides increased overall efficacy, but did not overcome the rhythmic time of day effect. Results of the multiple regression analysis showed that after environmental temperature, time of day was the second most important predictor of percent weed kill. Thus, circadian timing of herbicide application significantly influenced weed control with both glyphosate and glufosinate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)405-422
Number of pages18
JournalChronobiology international
Issue number2
StatePublished - May 18 2002


  • Annual weeds
  • Chronotoxicity
  • Circadian rhythm
  • Glufosinate
  • Glyphosate
  • Herbicide

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Circadian response of annual weeds to glyphosate and glufosinate'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this