Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Cigarette filter ventilation, product appeal and regulatory options: a review of the influence of ventilation on consumers’ sensory and risk perceptions

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective: Cigarette filter ventilation may enhance product appeal, support initiation and sustained smoking, and increase smoking prevalence. We reviewed recent evidence on how filter ventilation affects consumers’ perceptions of product appeal and considered product use preferences to inform regulatory options. Data sources: PubMed, Embase and PsycINFO databases were searched up to December 2023. Systematic search strategies used terms based on cigarette filter ventilation, and multiple constructs comprising product appeal and user perceptions. Study selection: Two reviewers screened all 917 retrieved titles and abstracts independently and applied a consensus strategy to identify 16 articles that met eligibility criteria. Data extraction: Extracted data focused on study design, dependent variables or outcomes, and major conclusions. Data synthesis: While remaining popular, awareness and risk perception of ventilated cigarettes is generally low. Cigarettes with filter ventilation are perceived as smoother and less irritating than non-ventilated cigarettes. These modified sensory experiences shape perceptions of reduced health risks. Pack text descriptors and colours convey further information to consumers about smoothness, supporting lowered risk perceptions. Conclusions: Filter ventilation and its associated marketing continue to influence consumers’ perceptions of smoothness creating misperceptions about health risks. Standardised (‘plain’) packaging regulations are recommended to restrict communication of ventilation themes as well as evidence-based health communications to correct consumer misperceptions about smoothness and health risks. Since filter ventilation has no benefits for public health, policy makers could consider banning filter ventilation or even disallowing filters.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)250-256
Number of pages7
JournalTobacco control
Volume35
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ Group. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Keywords

  • Addiction
  • Advertising and Promotion
  • Packaging and Labelling
  • Prevention

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article
  • Review
  • Systematic Review
  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cigarette filter ventilation, product appeal and regulatory options: a review of the influence of ventilation on consumers’ sensory and risk perceptions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this