Childhood maltreatment predicts daily stressor exposure in college students but not perceived stress or stress reactivity

Majel R. Baker, Viann N. Nguyen-Feng, Haema Nilakanta, Patricia A. Frazier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

The purpose of this observational longitudinal study was to investigate the role of childhood maltreatment in explaining individual differences in daily stress processes. College students (N = 253) completed the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire and a measure of neuroticism at baseline before completing 14 nightly surveys assessing exposure to daily stressors (particularly interpersonal stressors), perceived stressor severity, and negative affect. Given mixed findings in past research, no specific hypotheses were proffered. Generalized linear mixed modeling showed that students with a history of maltreatment experienced roughly one more stressor every 1-to-2 days compared with those without a history of maltreatment, and experienced an interpersonal stressor on approximately half of the 14 study days compared to about one quarter of the study days for those without a history of maltreatment. In contrast, childhood maltreatment (except for physical abuse) was unrelated to perceived stressor severity and stress reactivity, controlling for gender and neuroticism. This suggests that college students reporting childhood maltreatment have more daily stressors, but they neither perceive them as more stressful nor react to them more strongly. In exploratory analyses assessing exposure to specific stressors, childhood maltreatment was associated with reporting more financial, work-related, career, and grade-related stressors in addition to interpersonal stressors. These findings underscore the importance of assessing stressor exposure separately from stress reactions. They also suggest that both individualized skill-based interventions to reduce stressor exposure and campus-wide programs to reduce financial and other burdens on students may be warranted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)79-89
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of counseling psychology
Volume67
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2020

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Support for Majel R. Baker was provided by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program under Grant 00039202. Portions of this article were presented at the annual conventions of the International Society of Traumatic Stress Studies, November 9 11, 2017, Chicago, Illinois and the Minnesota Psychological Association, April 1516, 2016, Plymouth, Minnesota.

Funding Information:
This article was published Online First May 30, 2019. X Majel R. Baker and Viann N. Nguyen-Feng, Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities; Haema Nilakanta, School of Statistics, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities; Patricia A. Frazier, Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities. Support for Majel R. Baker was provided by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program under Grant 00039202. Portions of this article were presented at the annual conventions of the International Society of Traumatic Stress Studies, November 9 –11, 2017, Chicago, Illinois and the Minnesota Psychological Association, April 15–16, 2016, Plymouth, Minnesota.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 American Psychological Association.

Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • Childhood abuse
  • Childhood maltreatment
  • Daily diary
  • Experience sampling
  • Stress reactivity
  • Stress, Psychological/diagnosis
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Forecasting
  • Young Adult
  • Universities/trends
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Child Abuse/psychology
  • Female
  • Students/psychology
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Child
  • Longitudinal Studies

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Childhood maltreatment predicts daily stressor exposure in college students but not perceived stress or stress reactivity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this