Childhood attachment and adult personality: A life history perspective

Ethan S. Young, Jeffry A. Simpson, Vladas Griskevicius, Chloe O. Huelsnitz, Cory Fleck

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

According to attachment theory, being securely attached to one’s primary caregiver early in life should be related to personality adulthood. However, no studies to date have investigated this key premise using prospective data. To address this gap, we discuss evolutionary-based models of attachment and use them to examine how secure versus insecure children might score differently on Big 5 traits that underlie the meta-trait stability. We modeled data from Minnesota Longitudinal Study of Risk and Adaptation (N = 170), which has followed participants across 30 years. Participant’s early attachment status was assessed in Ainsworth’s Strange at 12 and 18 months and personality was assessed on Big 5 measures at age 32. Being securely attached early in childhood predicted three of the Big 5 traits known to tap the meta-trait stability. Specifically, participants rated as secure early in life scored higher on agreeableness and conscientiousness and lower on neuroticism in adulthood, whereas those rated as insecure scored lower on agreeableness and conscientiousness and higher on neuroticism. Exploratory mediation analyses revealed that neither adult attachment representations nor internalizing/externalizing symptoms mediated the association between early security and stability. The implications of these findings for understanding the origins of personality variation are discussed. .

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)22-38
Number of pages17
JournalSelf and Identity
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2 2019

Fingerprint

Personality
Caregivers
Longitudinal Studies
Neuroticism

Keywords

  • Attachment
  • adult personality
  • life history theory
  • social development

Cite this

Childhood attachment and adult personality : A life history perspective. / Young, Ethan S.; Simpson, Jeffry A.; Griskevicius, Vladas; Huelsnitz, Chloe O.; Fleck, Cory.

In: Self and Identity, Vol. 18, No. 1, 02.01.2019, p. 22-38.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Young, Ethan S. ; Simpson, Jeffry A. ; Griskevicius, Vladas ; Huelsnitz, Chloe O. ; Fleck, Cory. / Childhood attachment and adult personality : A life history perspective. In: Self and Identity. 2019 ; Vol. 18, No. 1. pp. 22-38.
@article{f957c295d2e844bab3ab8362debdb818,
title = "Childhood attachment and adult personality: A life history perspective",
abstract = "According to attachment theory, being securely attached to one’s primary caregiver early in life should be related to personality adulthood. However, no studies to date have investigated this key premise using prospective data. To address this gap, we discuss evolutionary-based models of attachment and use them to examine how secure versus insecure children might score differently on Big 5 traits that underlie the meta-trait stability. We modeled data from Minnesota Longitudinal Study of Risk and Adaptation (N = 170), which has followed participants across 30 years. Participant’s early attachment status was assessed in Ainsworth’s Strange at 12 and 18 months and personality was assessed on Big 5 measures at age 32. Being securely attached early in childhood predicted three of the Big 5 traits known to tap the meta-trait stability. Specifically, participants rated as secure early in life scored higher on agreeableness and conscientiousness and lower on neuroticism in adulthood, whereas those rated as insecure scored lower on agreeableness and conscientiousness and higher on neuroticism. Exploratory mediation analyses revealed that neither adult attachment representations nor internalizing/externalizing symptoms mediated the association between early security and stability. The implications of these findings for understanding the origins of personality variation are discussed. .",
keywords = "Attachment, adult personality, life history theory, social development",
author = "Young, {Ethan S.} and Simpson, {Jeffry A.} and Vladas Griskevicius and Huelsnitz, {Chloe O.} and Cory Fleck",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/15298868.2017.1353540",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "22--38",
journal = "Self and Identity",
issn = "1529-8868",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Childhood attachment and adult personality

T2 - A life history perspective

AU - Young, Ethan S.

AU - Simpson, Jeffry A.

AU - Griskevicius, Vladas

AU - Huelsnitz, Chloe O.

AU - Fleck, Cory

PY - 2019/1/2

Y1 - 2019/1/2

N2 - According to attachment theory, being securely attached to one’s primary caregiver early in life should be related to personality adulthood. However, no studies to date have investigated this key premise using prospective data. To address this gap, we discuss evolutionary-based models of attachment and use them to examine how secure versus insecure children might score differently on Big 5 traits that underlie the meta-trait stability. We modeled data from Minnesota Longitudinal Study of Risk and Adaptation (N = 170), which has followed participants across 30 years. Participant’s early attachment status was assessed in Ainsworth’s Strange at 12 and 18 months and personality was assessed on Big 5 measures at age 32. Being securely attached early in childhood predicted three of the Big 5 traits known to tap the meta-trait stability. Specifically, participants rated as secure early in life scored higher on agreeableness and conscientiousness and lower on neuroticism in adulthood, whereas those rated as insecure scored lower on agreeableness and conscientiousness and higher on neuroticism. Exploratory mediation analyses revealed that neither adult attachment representations nor internalizing/externalizing symptoms mediated the association between early security and stability. The implications of these findings for understanding the origins of personality variation are discussed. .

AB - According to attachment theory, being securely attached to one’s primary caregiver early in life should be related to personality adulthood. However, no studies to date have investigated this key premise using prospective data. To address this gap, we discuss evolutionary-based models of attachment and use them to examine how secure versus insecure children might score differently on Big 5 traits that underlie the meta-trait stability. We modeled data from Minnesota Longitudinal Study of Risk and Adaptation (N = 170), which has followed participants across 30 years. Participant’s early attachment status was assessed in Ainsworth’s Strange at 12 and 18 months and personality was assessed on Big 5 measures at age 32. Being securely attached early in childhood predicted three of the Big 5 traits known to tap the meta-trait stability. Specifically, participants rated as secure early in life scored higher on agreeableness and conscientiousness and lower on neuroticism in adulthood, whereas those rated as insecure scored lower on agreeableness and conscientiousness and higher on neuroticism. Exploratory mediation analyses revealed that neither adult attachment representations nor internalizing/externalizing symptoms mediated the association between early security and stability. The implications of these findings for understanding the origins of personality variation are discussed. .

KW - Attachment

KW - adult personality

KW - life history theory

KW - social development

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85025128223&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85025128223&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15298868.2017.1353540

DO - 10.1080/15298868.2017.1353540

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85025128223

VL - 18

SP - 22

EP - 38

JO - Self and Identity

JF - Self and Identity

SN - 1529-8868

IS - 1

ER -