Abstract
This communication builds on prior research describing how the orientation of a molecular representation can impact student thinking about molecular symmetry. To further support this claim, we present evidence that molecular orientation can impact students’ thinking about reflection planes and reflection operations. We tasked students with performing a reflection operation on a series of planar and nonplanar molecules, each presented in two different orientations. We found that while some students were consistent in the reflection plane they chose across the different orientations, others identified different reflection planes. These findings suggest that students’ analyses of molecular representations should not be considered stable with respect to the orientation of the representation. Implications of this work are framed in the context of the complex manifold of students’ cognitive resource activation patterns and the dependency of those activation patterns on the nature of the task at hand.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 5122-5128 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | Journal of Chemical Education |
Volume | 101 |
Issue number | 11 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Nov 12 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2024 American Chemical Society and Division of Chemical Education, Inc.
Keywords
- Group theory/Symmetry
- Inorganic chemistry
- Testing/Assessment
- Upper-Division Undergraduate