Changes in otoacoustic emissions during selective auditory and visual attention

Kyle P. Walsh, Edward G. Pasanen, Dennis McFadden

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

20 Scopus citations

Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated that the otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) measured during behavioral tasks can have different magnitudes when subjects are attending selectively or not attending. The implication is that the cognitive and perceptual demands of a task can affect the first neural stage of auditory processing - the sensory receptors themselves. However, the directions of the reported attentional effects have been inconsistent, the magnitudes of the observed differences typically have been small, and comparisons across studies have been made difficult by significant procedural differences. In this study, a nonlinear version of the stimulus-frequency OAE (SFOAE), called the nSFOAE, was used to measure cochlear responses from human subjects while they simultaneously performed behavioral tasks requiring selective auditory attention (dichotic or diotic listening), selective visual attention, or relative inattention. Within subjects, the differences in nSFOAE magnitude between inattention and attention conditions were about 2-3dB for both auditory and visual modalities, and the effect sizes for the differences typically were large for both nSFOAE magnitude and phase. These results reveal that the cochlear efferent reflex is differentially active during selective attention and inattention, for both auditory and visual tasks, although they do not reveal how attention is improved when efferent activity is greater.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2737-2757
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of the Acoustical Society of America
Volume137
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2015

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article
  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Changes in otoacoustic emissions during selective auditory and visual attention'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this