Abstract
We investigated the differential effects of self-explaining a refutational text, compared to thinking aloud or rereading. Undergraduate students (n = 105) read a refutational text about natural selection and were asked to either self-explain, think-aloud, or re-read the text. Then they completed a posttest that assessed general knowledge of natural selection. Students who self-explained the refutational text subsequently outperformed their peers on a test of their knowledge of natural selection. Additionally, the results suggest that both instructional and performance differences were significantly linked to the degree of causal cohesion present within students' natural language responses to the text (i.e., self-explanations and think-alouds).
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci 2015 |
| Editors | David C. Noelle, Rick Dale, Anne Warlaumont, Jeff Yoshimi, Teenie Matlock, Carolyn D. Jennings, Paul P. Maglio |
| Publisher | The Cognitive Science Society |
| Pages | 78-83 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9780991196722 |
| State | Published - 2015 |
| Externally published | Yes |
| Event | 37th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society: Mind, Technology, and Society, CogSci 2015 - Pasadena, United States Duration: Jul 23 2015 → Jul 25 2015 |
Publication series
| Name | Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci 2015 |
|---|
Conference
| Conference | 37th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society: Mind, Technology, and Society, CogSci 2015 |
|---|---|
| Country/Territory | United States |
| City | Pasadena |
| Period | 7/23/15 → 7/25/15 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:This research was supported in part by the Institute for Educational Sciences (IES R305A130124) and National Science Foundation (NSF REC0241144; IIS-0735682). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the IES or NSF.
Publisher Copyright:
© Cognitive Science Society, CogSci 2015.All rights reserved.
Keywords
- cohesion
- comprehension
- computational linguistics
- conceptual change
- self-explanation
- strategies