Abstract
Buffer exchange is a critical step in biologics development, playing a pivotal role in removing contaminants, adjusting sample conditions, and facilitating compatibility studies. The efficiency of centrifugal concentrators for polysorbate removal was compared to a two-step approach involving a surfactant removal column followed by buffer exchange. Trastuzumab-pkrb from Herzuma® was used. While a 30 kDa centrifugal concentrator was ineffective in polysorbate removal, a 50 kDa concentrator caused partial removal. Surfactant removal column proved more effective in removing polysorbates. Buffer exchange using polysorbate-containing formulation buffer, even with a 50 kDa concentrator, accumulated polysorbate, revealing the need for a different approach in small-scale formulation. Adding polysorbate in a separate step after buffer exchange appeared to be a good strategy to prevent this problem. The two approaches did not reveal any differences in the protein aggregation behavior.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Article number | 125146 |
| Journal | International journal of pharmaceutics |
| Volume | 670 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Feb 10 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2024 Elsevier B.V.
Keywords
- Buffer exchange
- Centrifugal concentrators
- Excipients
- Formulation screening
- Monoclonal antibodies
- Polysorbate removal
PubMed: MeSH publication types
- Journal Article
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Challenges with effective removal of surfactants from monoclonal antibody formulations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS