Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Cervical Pedicle Inlet Screws: A Novel Trajectory for Navigated Sub-axial Cervical Screw Placement With Improved Biomechanical Characteristics Compared to Lateral Mass Screws

  • Christopher T. Martin
  • , Deb A. Bhowmick
  • , Vincent Rossi
  • , Domagoj Coric
  • , Martin H. Pham
  • , Amber Schweitzer
  • , Daniel Woods
  • , Jeremy J. Rawlinson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Study Design: Cadaveric Biomechanical. Objective: To investigate the biomechanical characteristics of a new screw trajectory, which we have deemed the “pedicle inlet” trajectory. Methods: Four surgeons familiar with standard and image-guided cervical pedicle screw fixation techniques placed 3.5 mm diameter cervical fixation screws randomized at each sub-axial level to one of three fixation techniques: cervical pedicle, pedicle inlet, and lateral mass screw. A total of 180 screws were placed from C3 to C7 in 18 cadaveric spine samples. Maximal insertional torque was measured during the final seating of the screws. After confirmation of accuracy of screws with post-procedural CT-imaging, individual screws in the cadaveric samples were biomechanically tested for pull-out strength. Results: All screws were placed without breach into neurovascular spaces. The final insertional torque was equivalent (ANOVA, P > .05, 3.6 ± 1.7 Nm) across cervical pedicle screws, pedicle inlet, and lateral mass screws. Maximal pullout strength was observed for cervical pedicle screws (814.6 ± 387.3 N). Pedicle inlet screws had a 51% higher pullout strength as compared to lateral mass screws (593.2 ± 289.9 N v 392.4 ± 284.0 N, P < .01). All differences were statistically distinct from each other (ANOVA, P < .01). Conclusions: Use of image-guidance allows for safe placement along the pedicle inlet trajectory, with no recorded screw malposition, and a 51% improvement in pull out strength as compared to lateral mass screws. The pedicle inlet trajectory offers an alternative to traditional lateral mass screws with better fixation quality and may have particular application in percutaneous or minimally invasive posterior fusions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)532-541
Number of pages10
JournalGlobal Spine Journal
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

Keywords

  • biomechanical
  • cervical
  • lateral mass screw
  • pedicle screw
  • pullout strength
  • trajectory

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cervical Pedicle Inlet Screws: A Novel Trajectory for Navigated Sub-axial Cervical Screw Placement With Improved Biomechanical Characteristics Compared to Lateral Mass Screws'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this