TY - JOUR
T1 - CEO commitment to the status Quo
T2 - Replication and extension using content analysis
AU - McClelland, Patrick L.
AU - Liang, Xin
AU - Barker, Vincent L.
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - A limited number of studies have identified multilevel determinants of chief executive officer (CEO) commitment to the status quo (CSQ). Using an unintrusive measure of CEO CSQ developed through computer-aided content analyses of CEO letters to shareholders, this study confirmed that determinants of CEO CSQ are multilevel, including factors at the individual (CEO age and tenure), organizational (size and financial slack), and industry (extent of industry discretion) levels of analysis. In addition, as an important extension to prior research, the authors find that CEO CSQ is associated with future performance changes depending on a firm's industry environment. They find that in high-discretion industries, firms whose CEOs are committed to the status quo suffer future financial and market performance declines as compared with their competitors, whereas such performance deterioration does not occur in low-discretion environments. Indeed, when future performance is market based and measured as Tobin's Q, the authors find that compared with competitors, a firm's performance actually improves in low-discretion industries if its CEO is committed to the status quo.
AB - A limited number of studies have identified multilevel determinants of chief executive officer (CEO) commitment to the status quo (CSQ). Using an unintrusive measure of CEO CSQ developed through computer-aided content analyses of CEO letters to shareholders, this study confirmed that determinants of CEO CSQ are multilevel, including factors at the individual (CEO age and tenure), organizational (size and financial slack), and industry (extent of industry discretion) levels of analysis. In addition, as an important extension to prior research, the authors find that CEO CSQ is associated with future performance changes depending on a firm's industry environment. They find that in high-discretion industries, firms whose CEOs are committed to the status quo suffer future financial and market performance declines as compared with their competitors, whereas such performance deterioration does not occur in low-discretion environments. Indeed, when future performance is market based and measured as Tobin's Q, the authors find that compared with competitors, a firm's performance actually improves in low-discretion industries if its CEO is committed to the status quo.
KW - CEOs
KW - Change
KW - Content analysis
KW - Executive beliefs
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/77955197438
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/77955197438#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1177/0149206309345019
DO - 10.1177/0149206309345019
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:77955197438
SN - 0149-2063
VL - 36
SP - 1251
EP - 1277
JO - Journal of Management
JF - Journal of Management
IS - 5
ER -