Centralization of intragroup equity ties and performance of business group affiliates

Ishtiaq P. Mahmood, Hongjin Zhu, Aks Zaheer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Research summary: Although prior research has suggested that equity ties are important for business groups, less attention has been paid to the specific mechanisms through which equity ties create value. We develop a framework that specifies how centralization of intragroup equity ties affects the performance of group affiliates. We use the exogenous shock of the 2008 financial crisis and a difference-in-differences analysis of 51,730 observations of business group affiliates in Taiwan to show that centralization of equity ties enhances affiliate performance, but such effects weaken when the environment becomes turbulent. Moreover, we find that listed affiliates obtain fewer benefits from centralization than unlisted affiliates. Overall, our study deepens scholarly understanding of not only how groups create value, but also how value is differentially appropriated among affiliates. Managerial summary: Our research speaks directly to owner-managers of business groups with respect to creating an optimal equity network structure that binds the affiliated firms of the group. Our findings suggest to managers that the overall structure of equity ties in a business group has major implications for the performance of the affiliate firms of the group, and the network structure within the group should be designed deliberately and thoughtfully on an on-going basis. In particular, control through centralized equity ties is performance-enhancing in normal periods, but such control may be counterproductive as turbulence increases in business environments, or as the number of listed group firms increases. Hence, owner-managers may consider optimizing the network structure by lowering the degree of centralized equity ties under such circumstances, or at a minimum, lowering centralized control.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1082-1100
Number of pages19
JournalStrategic Management Journal
Volume38
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2017

Fingerprint

Centralization
Equity
Business groups
Network structure
Owner-managers
Centralized control
Financial crisis
Business environment
Difference-in-differences
Exogenous shocks
Taiwan
Managers
Turbulence

Keywords

  • affiliate performance
  • business group
  • equity ties
  • network centralization
  • turbulence

Cite this

Centralization of intragroup equity ties and performance of business group affiliates. / Mahmood, Ishtiaq P.; Zhu, Hongjin; Zaheer, Aks.

In: Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 38, No. 5, 01.05.2017, p. 1082-1100.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2f48788f501d4842a8a854b4d99f48c3,
title = "Centralization of intragroup equity ties and performance of business group affiliates",
abstract = "Research summary: Although prior research has suggested that equity ties are important for business groups, less attention has been paid to the specific mechanisms through which equity ties create value. We develop a framework that specifies how centralization of intragroup equity ties affects the performance of group affiliates. We use the exogenous shock of the 2008 financial crisis and a difference-in-differences analysis of 51,730 observations of business group affiliates in Taiwan to show that centralization of equity ties enhances affiliate performance, but such effects weaken when the environment becomes turbulent. Moreover, we find that listed affiliates obtain fewer benefits from centralization than unlisted affiliates. Overall, our study deepens scholarly understanding of not only how groups create value, but also how value is differentially appropriated among affiliates. Managerial summary: Our research speaks directly to owner-managers of business groups with respect to creating an optimal equity network structure that binds the affiliated firms of the group. Our findings suggest to managers that the overall structure of equity ties in a business group has major implications for the performance of the affiliate firms of the group, and the network structure within the group should be designed deliberately and thoughtfully on an on-going basis. In particular, control through centralized equity ties is performance-enhancing in normal periods, but such control may be counterproductive as turbulence increases in business environments, or as the number of listed group firms increases. Hence, owner-managers may consider optimizing the network structure by lowering the degree of centralized equity ties under such circumstances, or at a minimum, lowering centralized control.",
keywords = "affiliate performance, business group, equity ties, network centralization, turbulence",
author = "Mahmood, {Ishtiaq P.} and Hongjin Zhu and Aks Zaheer",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/smj.2542",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "1082--1100",
journal = "Strategic Management Journal",
issn = "0143-2095",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Centralization of intragroup equity ties and performance of business group affiliates

AU - Mahmood, Ishtiaq P.

AU - Zhu, Hongjin

AU - Zaheer, Aks

PY - 2017/5/1

Y1 - 2017/5/1

N2 - Research summary: Although prior research has suggested that equity ties are important for business groups, less attention has been paid to the specific mechanisms through which equity ties create value. We develop a framework that specifies how centralization of intragroup equity ties affects the performance of group affiliates. We use the exogenous shock of the 2008 financial crisis and a difference-in-differences analysis of 51,730 observations of business group affiliates in Taiwan to show that centralization of equity ties enhances affiliate performance, but such effects weaken when the environment becomes turbulent. Moreover, we find that listed affiliates obtain fewer benefits from centralization than unlisted affiliates. Overall, our study deepens scholarly understanding of not only how groups create value, but also how value is differentially appropriated among affiliates. Managerial summary: Our research speaks directly to owner-managers of business groups with respect to creating an optimal equity network structure that binds the affiliated firms of the group. Our findings suggest to managers that the overall structure of equity ties in a business group has major implications for the performance of the affiliate firms of the group, and the network structure within the group should be designed deliberately and thoughtfully on an on-going basis. In particular, control through centralized equity ties is performance-enhancing in normal periods, but such control may be counterproductive as turbulence increases in business environments, or as the number of listed group firms increases. Hence, owner-managers may consider optimizing the network structure by lowering the degree of centralized equity ties under such circumstances, or at a minimum, lowering centralized control.

AB - Research summary: Although prior research has suggested that equity ties are important for business groups, less attention has been paid to the specific mechanisms through which equity ties create value. We develop a framework that specifies how centralization of intragroup equity ties affects the performance of group affiliates. We use the exogenous shock of the 2008 financial crisis and a difference-in-differences analysis of 51,730 observations of business group affiliates in Taiwan to show that centralization of equity ties enhances affiliate performance, but such effects weaken when the environment becomes turbulent. Moreover, we find that listed affiliates obtain fewer benefits from centralization than unlisted affiliates. Overall, our study deepens scholarly understanding of not only how groups create value, but also how value is differentially appropriated among affiliates. Managerial summary: Our research speaks directly to owner-managers of business groups with respect to creating an optimal equity network structure that binds the affiliated firms of the group. Our findings suggest to managers that the overall structure of equity ties in a business group has major implications for the performance of the affiliate firms of the group, and the network structure within the group should be designed deliberately and thoughtfully on an on-going basis. In particular, control through centralized equity ties is performance-enhancing in normal periods, but such control may be counterproductive as turbulence increases in business environments, or as the number of listed group firms increases. Hence, owner-managers may consider optimizing the network structure by lowering the degree of centralized equity ties under such circumstances, or at a minimum, lowering centralized control.

KW - affiliate performance

KW - business group

KW - equity ties

KW - network centralization

KW - turbulence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994097119&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84994097119&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/smj.2542

DO - 10.1002/smj.2542

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84994097119

VL - 38

SP - 1082

EP - 1100

JO - Strategic Management Journal

JF - Strategic Management Journal

SN - 0143-2095

IS - 5

ER -