TY - JOUR
T1 - Cell phone use while driving laws and motor vehicle driver fatalities
T2 - differences in population subgroups and location
AU - Rudisill, Toni M.
AU - Chu, Haitao
AU - Zhu, Motao
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2018/10
Y1 - 2018/10
N2 - Purpose: Research suggests that cell phone use while driving laws are associated with lower driver fatalities. This study seeks to determine whether this relationship is modified by driver age (16–24, 25–39, 40–59, ≥60), sex (male, female), race/ethnicity (white non-Hispanic, white Hispanic, black non-Hispanic, other), or rurality (rural, urban). Methods: Fatality Analysis Reporting System data were merged with state legislation (2000–2014). The exposure was the type of legislation in effect. The outcome was non–alcohol-related driver fatalities by state-quarter-year. Incident rate ratios were estimated using generalized Poisson mixed regression for overdispersed count data with robust standard errors. Results: Amongst 190,544 drivers, compared to periods without bans, universal hand-held calling bans were associated with 10% (adjusted incident rate ratio = 0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.84, 0.96) lower non–alcohol-related driver fatalities overall and up to 13% lower fatalities across all age groups and sexes but not for race/ethnicity or rurality. When comparing state-quarter-years with bans to those without, universal texting bans were not associated with lower fatalities overall or for any demographic group. Conclusions: The relationships between cell phone laws and non–alcohol-related driver fatalities are modified by driver demographics, particularly for universal hand-held bans. Universal hand-held calling bans may benefit more types of drivers compared to texting bans.
AB - Purpose: Research suggests that cell phone use while driving laws are associated with lower driver fatalities. This study seeks to determine whether this relationship is modified by driver age (16–24, 25–39, 40–59, ≥60), sex (male, female), race/ethnicity (white non-Hispanic, white Hispanic, black non-Hispanic, other), or rurality (rural, urban). Methods: Fatality Analysis Reporting System data were merged with state legislation (2000–2014). The exposure was the type of legislation in effect. The outcome was non–alcohol-related driver fatalities by state-quarter-year. Incident rate ratios were estimated using generalized Poisson mixed regression for overdispersed count data with robust standard errors. Results: Amongst 190,544 drivers, compared to periods without bans, universal hand-held calling bans were associated with 10% (adjusted incident rate ratio = 0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.84, 0.96) lower non–alcohol-related driver fatalities overall and up to 13% lower fatalities across all age groups and sexes but not for race/ethnicity or rurality. When comparing state-quarter-years with bans to those without, universal texting bans were not associated with lower fatalities overall or for any demographic group. Conclusions: The relationships between cell phone laws and non–alcohol-related driver fatalities are modified by driver demographics, particularly for universal hand-held bans. Universal hand-held calling bans may benefit more types of drivers compared to texting bans.
KW - Automobile driving
KW - Cell phones
KW - Epidemiology
KW - Fatal outcome
KW - Legislation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051710589&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051710589&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.07.015
DO - 10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.07.015
M3 - Article
C2 - 30143355
AN - SCOPUS:85051710589
SN - 1047-2797
VL - 28
SP - 730
EP - 735
JO - Annals of epidemiology
JF - Annals of epidemiology
IS - 10
ER -