Causal Identification Through a Cumulative Body of Research in the Study of Strategy and Organizations

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Scopus citations

Abstract

I highlight why taking causal identification seriously is important for the study of strategy and organizations. Nevertheless, the nature of the questions that are central to our field and the nature of the data we have to answer these questions complicates doing so. Because of this, I suggest that we explicitly consider identification as an issue that can be addressed only through a cumulative body of empirical research. I outline current research norms and practices that impede adopting this approach and recommend a set of actions to help overcome these norms and practices.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1244-1256
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Management
Volume46
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2020

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Comments from Mary Benner, Tim Simcoe, Joel Waldfogel, and participants at the NSF-UF Workshop on Robust and Reliable Research in the Science of Organizations helped me develop and refine these ideas. I am also grateful to the anonymous reviewers, Gwendolyn Lee, and Mo Wang for their constructive comments and encouragement.

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2019.

Keywords

  • causality
  • endogeneity
  • identification
  • research design
  • research practices

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Causal Identification Through a Cumulative Body of Research in the Study of Strategy and Organizations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this