Casual sex and psychological health among young adults: Is having "friends with benefits" emotionally damaging?

Marla E. Eisenberg, Diann M. Ackard, Michael D. Resnick, Dianne Neumark-Sztainer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

59 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

CONTEXT: Speculation in public discourse suggests that sexual encounters outside a committed romantic relationship may be emotionally damaging for young people, and federal abstinence education policy has required teaching that sexual activity outside of a marital relationship is likely to have harmful psychological consequences. METHODS: In 2003-2004, a diverse sample of 1,311 sexually active young adults (mean age, 20.5) participating in a longitudinal study in Minnesota completed a survey including measures of sexual behavior and psychological wellbeing. Chi-square tests were used to compare the prevalence of recent casual partnerships by selected demographic and personal categories. General linear modeling was then used to compare mean levels of each psychological wellbeing measure between those reporting recent casual partners and those reporting committed partners; partner type was measured both dichotomously and categorically. RESULTS: One-fifth of participants reported that their most recent sex partner was a casual partner (i.e., casual acquaintance or close but nonexclusive partner). Casual partnerships were more common among men than among women (29% vs. 14%), and the proportions of male and female respondents reporting a recent casual partner diff ered by race or ethnicity. Scores of psychological well-being were generally consistent across sex partner categories, and no significant associations between partner type and well-being were found in adjusted analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Young adults who engage in casual sexual encounters do not appear to be at greater risk for harmful psychological outcomes than sexually active young adults in more committed relationships.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)231-237
Number of pages7
JournalPerspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
Volume41
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2009

Fingerprint

young adult
Young Adult
Psychology
Health
health
well-being
psychological consequences
Sexual Behavior
speculation
longitudinal study
ethnicity
Chi-Square Distribution
Marriage
discourse
Longitudinal Studies
Teaching
Demography
education
Education
Surveys and Questionnaires

Cite this

Casual sex and psychological health among young adults : Is having "friends with benefits" emotionally damaging? / Eisenberg, Marla E.; Ackard, Diann M.; Resnick, Michael D.; Neumark-Sztainer, Dianne.

In: Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, Vol. 41, No. 4, 01.12.2009, p. 231-237.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7d2e80323ee8459ea051b4af7b04c968,
title = "Casual sex and psychological health among young adults: Is having {"}friends with benefits{"} emotionally damaging?",
abstract = "CONTEXT: Speculation in public discourse suggests that sexual encounters outside a committed romantic relationship may be emotionally damaging for young people, and federal abstinence education policy has required teaching that sexual activity outside of a marital relationship is likely to have harmful psychological consequences. METHODS: In 2003-2004, a diverse sample of 1,311 sexually active young adults (mean age, 20.5) participating in a longitudinal study in Minnesota completed a survey including measures of sexual behavior and psychological wellbeing. Chi-square tests were used to compare the prevalence of recent casual partnerships by selected demographic and personal categories. General linear modeling was then used to compare mean levels of each psychological wellbeing measure between those reporting recent casual partners and those reporting committed partners; partner type was measured both dichotomously and categorically. RESULTS: One-fifth of participants reported that their most recent sex partner was a casual partner (i.e., casual acquaintance or close but nonexclusive partner). Casual partnerships were more common among men than among women (29{\%} vs. 14{\%}), and the proportions of male and female respondents reporting a recent casual partner diff ered by race or ethnicity. Scores of psychological well-being were generally consistent across sex partner categories, and no significant associations between partner type and well-being were found in adjusted analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Young adults who engage in casual sexual encounters do not appear to be at greater risk for harmful psychological outcomes than sexually active young adults in more committed relationships.",
author = "Eisenberg, {Marla E.} and Ackard, {Diann M.} and Resnick, {Michael D.} and Dianne Neumark-Sztainer",
year = "2009",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1363/4123109",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "231--237",
journal = "Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health",
issn = "1538-6341",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Casual sex and psychological health among young adults

T2 - Is having "friends with benefits" emotionally damaging?

AU - Eisenberg, Marla E.

AU - Ackard, Diann M.

AU - Resnick, Michael D.

AU - Neumark-Sztainer, Dianne

PY - 2009/12/1

Y1 - 2009/12/1

N2 - CONTEXT: Speculation in public discourse suggests that sexual encounters outside a committed romantic relationship may be emotionally damaging for young people, and federal abstinence education policy has required teaching that sexual activity outside of a marital relationship is likely to have harmful psychological consequences. METHODS: In 2003-2004, a diverse sample of 1,311 sexually active young adults (mean age, 20.5) participating in a longitudinal study in Minnesota completed a survey including measures of sexual behavior and psychological wellbeing. Chi-square tests were used to compare the prevalence of recent casual partnerships by selected demographic and personal categories. General linear modeling was then used to compare mean levels of each psychological wellbeing measure between those reporting recent casual partners and those reporting committed partners; partner type was measured both dichotomously and categorically. RESULTS: One-fifth of participants reported that their most recent sex partner was a casual partner (i.e., casual acquaintance or close but nonexclusive partner). Casual partnerships were more common among men than among women (29% vs. 14%), and the proportions of male and female respondents reporting a recent casual partner diff ered by race or ethnicity. Scores of psychological well-being were generally consistent across sex partner categories, and no significant associations between partner type and well-being were found in adjusted analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Young adults who engage in casual sexual encounters do not appear to be at greater risk for harmful psychological outcomes than sexually active young adults in more committed relationships.

AB - CONTEXT: Speculation in public discourse suggests that sexual encounters outside a committed romantic relationship may be emotionally damaging for young people, and federal abstinence education policy has required teaching that sexual activity outside of a marital relationship is likely to have harmful psychological consequences. METHODS: In 2003-2004, a diverse sample of 1,311 sexually active young adults (mean age, 20.5) participating in a longitudinal study in Minnesota completed a survey including measures of sexual behavior and psychological wellbeing. Chi-square tests were used to compare the prevalence of recent casual partnerships by selected demographic and personal categories. General linear modeling was then used to compare mean levels of each psychological wellbeing measure between those reporting recent casual partners and those reporting committed partners; partner type was measured both dichotomously and categorically. RESULTS: One-fifth of participants reported that their most recent sex partner was a casual partner (i.e., casual acquaintance or close but nonexclusive partner). Casual partnerships were more common among men than among women (29% vs. 14%), and the proportions of male and female respondents reporting a recent casual partner diff ered by race or ethnicity. Scores of psychological well-being were generally consistent across sex partner categories, and no significant associations between partner type and well-being were found in adjusted analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Young adults who engage in casual sexual encounters do not appear to be at greater risk for harmful psychological outcomes than sexually active young adults in more committed relationships.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=71749092283&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=71749092283&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1363/4123109

DO - 10.1363/4123109

M3 - Article

C2 - 20444178

AN - SCOPUS:71749092283

VL - 41

SP - 231

EP - 237

JO - Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health

JF - Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health

SN - 1538-6341

IS - 4

ER -