Abstract
Carlos Castaneda's The Teachings of Don Juan fails before the question: What does it mean? What it does is to demand a different kind of reading - to be read as a recipe. Castaneda's text denies the regime of signifcation (by eliding the question of its own authenticity), casting its readers out along a line of fight of passional apprenticeship. Through a deployment of Deleuze and Guattari's notions of regimes of sign and the refrain, I argue that The Teachings can be proftably read as both an example of insurrectionist psychedelic science and as a self-referential ecstatic pedagogy.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 245-267 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Journal | Configurations |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2008 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 4 Quality Education
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Castaneda's ecstatic pedagogy: The teachings of Don Juan'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS