Case studies, cross-site comparisons, and the challenge of generalization: Comparing agent-based models of land-use change in frontier regions

Dawn C. Parker, Barbara Entwisle, Ronald Rindfuss, Leah K. Vanwey, Steven M. Manson, Emilio Moran, Li An, Peter Deadman, Tom Evans, Marc Linderman, S. Mohammad Mussavi Rizi, George Malanson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Cross-site comparisons of case studies have been identified as an important priority by the land-use science community. From an empirical perspective, such comparisons potentially allow generalizations that may contribute to production of global-scale land-use and land-cover change projections. From a theoretical perspective, such comparisons can inform development of a theory of land-use science by identifying potential hypotheses and supporting or refuting evidence. This paper undertakes a structured comparison of four case studies of land-use change in frontier regions that follow an agent-based modeling approach. Our hypothesis is that each case study represents a particular manifestation of a common process. Given differences in initial conditions among sites and the time at which the process is observed, actual mechanisms and outcomes are anticipated to differ substantially between sites. Our goal is to reveal both commonalities and differences among research sites, model implementations, and ultimately, conclusions derived from the modeling process.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)41-72
Number of pages32
JournalJournal of Land Use Science
Volume3
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2008

Fingerprint

frontier region
land use change
land use
science
modeling
projection
land cover
comparison
community
evidence

Keywords

  • Agent-based model
  • Case studies
  • Frontier
  • Land-use change

Cite this

Case studies, cross-site comparisons, and the challenge of generalization : Comparing agent-based models of land-use change in frontier regions. / Parker, Dawn C.; Entwisle, Barbara; Rindfuss, Ronald; Vanwey, Leah K.; Manson, Steven M.; Moran, Emilio; An, Li; Deadman, Peter; Evans, Tom; Linderman, Marc; Mussavi Rizi, S. Mohammad; Malanson, George.

In: Journal of Land Use Science, Vol. 3, No. 1, 01.03.2008, p. 41-72.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Parker, DC, Entwisle, B, Rindfuss, R, Vanwey, LK, Manson, SM, Moran, E, An, L, Deadman, P, Evans, T, Linderman, M, Mussavi Rizi, SM & Malanson, G 2008, 'Case studies, cross-site comparisons, and the challenge of generalization: Comparing agent-based models of land-use change in frontier regions', Journal of Land Use Science, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 41-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/17474230802048151
Parker, Dawn C. ; Entwisle, Barbara ; Rindfuss, Ronald ; Vanwey, Leah K. ; Manson, Steven M. ; Moran, Emilio ; An, Li ; Deadman, Peter ; Evans, Tom ; Linderman, Marc ; Mussavi Rizi, S. Mohammad ; Malanson, George. / Case studies, cross-site comparisons, and the challenge of generalization : Comparing agent-based models of land-use change in frontier regions. In: Journal of Land Use Science. 2008 ; Vol. 3, No. 1. pp. 41-72.
@article{db80c53f552246aa8300d84ea0a28bf8,
title = "Case studies, cross-site comparisons, and the challenge of generalization: Comparing agent-based models of land-use change in frontier regions",
abstract = "Cross-site comparisons of case studies have been identified as an important priority by the land-use science community. From an empirical perspective, such comparisons potentially allow generalizations that may contribute to production of global-scale land-use and land-cover change projections. From a theoretical perspective, such comparisons can inform development of a theory of land-use science by identifying potential hypotheses and supporting or refuting evidence. This paper undertakes a structured comparison of four case studies of land-use change in frontier regions that follow an agent-based modeling approach. Our hypothesis is that each case study represents a particular manifestation of a common process. Given differences in initial conditions among sites and the time at which the process is observed, actual mechanisms and outcomes are anticipated to differ substantially between sites. Our goal is to reveal both commonalities and differences among research sites, model implementations, and ultimately, conclusions derived from the modeling process.",
keywords = "Agent-based model, Case studies, Frontier, Land-use change",
author = "Parker, {Dawn C.} and Barbara Entwisle and Ronald Rindfuss and Vanwey, {Leah K.} and Manson, {Steven M.} and Emilio Moran and Li An and Peter Deadman and Tom Evans and Marc Linderman and {Mussavi Rizi}, {S. Mohammad} and George Malanson",
year = "2008",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/17474230802048151",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "41--72",
journal = "Journal of Land Use Science",
issn = "1747-423X",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Case studies, cross-site comparisons, and the challenge of generalization

T2 - Comparing agent-based models of land-use change in frontier regions

AU - Parker, Dawn C.

AU - Entwisle, Barbara

AU - Rindfuss, Ronald

AU - Vanwey, Leah K.

AU - Manson, Steven M.

AU - Moran, Emilio

AU - An, Li

AU - Deadman, Peter

AU - Evans, Tom

AU - Linderman, Marc

AU - Mussavi Rizi, S. Mohammad

AU - Malanson, George

PY - 2008/3/1

Y1 - 2008/3/1

N2 - Cross-site comparisons of case studies have been identified as an important priority by the land-use science community. From an empirical perspective, such comparisons potentially allow generalizations that may contribute to production of global-scale land-use and land-cover change projections. From a theoretical perspective, such comparisons can inform development of a theory of land-use science by identifying potential hypotheses and supporting or refuting evidence. This paper undertakes a structured comparison of four case studies of land-use change in frontier regions that follow an agent-based modeling approach. Our hypothesis is that each case study represents a particular manifestation of a common process. Given differences in initial conditions among sites and the time at which the process is observed, actual mechanisms and outcomes are anticipated to differ substantially between sites. Our goal is to reveal both commonalities and differences among research sites, model implementations, and ultimately, conclusions derived from the modeling process.

AB - Cross-site comparisons of case studies have been identified as an important priority by the land-use science community. From an empirical perspective, such comparisons potentially allow generalizations that may contribute to production of global-scale land-use and land-cover change projections. From a theoretical perspective, such comparisons can inform development of a theory of land-use science by identifying potential hypotheses and supporting or refuting evidence. This paper undertakes a structured comparison of four case studies of land-use change in frontier regions that follow an agent-based modeling approach. Our hypothesis is that each case study represents a particular manifestation of a common process. Given differences in initial conditions among sites and the time at which the process is observed, actual mechanisms and outcomes are anticipated to differ substantially between sites. Our goal is to reveal both commonalities and differences among research sites, model implementations, and ultimately, conclusions derived from the modeling process.

KW - Agent-based model

KW - Case studies

KW - Frontier

KW - Land-use change

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=48249156215&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=48249156215&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/17474230802048151

DO - 10.1080/17474230802048151

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:48249156215

VL - 3

SP - 41

EP - 72

JO - Journal of Land Use Science

JF - Journal of Land Use Science

SN - 1747-423X

IS - 1

ER -