TY - JOUR
T1 - Carbon capture and storage in context
T2 - 9th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, GHGT-9
AU - Wilson, Elizabeth J
AU - Stephens, Jennie C.
AU - Rai Peterson, Tarla
AU - Fischlein, Miriam
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2011 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2009/2
Y1 - 2009/2
N2 - As a technology that may involve new risks, large-scale infrastructure, and significant government involvement, carbon capture and storage (CCS) faces a wide variety of deployment challenges. Because energy policy in the U.S. is negotiated at the state level, it is important to evaluate what might influence CCS related decisions in the U.S. at that level. This paper presents a detailed analysis of how deployment discussions and decisions regarding CCS are negotiated within Texas, Minnesota, and Massachusetts. These states were chosen based upon their current involvement in CCS research (high, medium, low), potential for deploying CCS (direct, indirect, or absent), and regulation (restructured, regulated). We explore nuances within the policy debates and public discourse surrounding CCS in these three states through the use of legislative and policy analysis, interviews with stakeholders, and media analysis. Using information generated from legislative dockets and state-level newspaper coverage we construct a template of CCS discussions, framing, and policy creation within each study state.
AB - As a technology that may involve new risks, large-scale infrastructure, and significant government involvement, carbon capture and storage (CCS) faces a wide variety of deployment challenges. Because energy policy in the U.S. is negotiated at the state level, it is important to evaluate what might influence CCS related decisions in the U.S. at that level. This paper presents a detailed analysis of how deployment discussions and decisions regarding CCS are negotiated within Texas, Minnesota, and Massachusetts. These states were chosen based upon their current involvement in CCS research (high, medium, low), potential for deploying CCS (direct, indirect, or absent), and regulation (restructured, regulated). We explore nuances within the policy debates and public discourse surrounding CCS in these three states through the use of legislative and policy analysis, interviews with stakeholders, and media analysis. Using information generated from legislative dockets and state-level newspaper coverage we construct a template of CCS discussions, framing, and policy creation within each study state.
KW - CCS
KW - Climate change
KW - Media framing
KW - Policy analysis
KW - Risk-benefit
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67650163921&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67650163921&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.270
DO - 10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.270
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:67650163921
SN - 1876-6102
VL - 1
SP - 4519
EP - 4526
JO - Energy Procedia
JF - Energy Procedia
IS - 1
Y2 - 16 November 2008 through 20 November 2008
ER -