TY - GEN
T1 - Cancer sensors based on graphene and graphene composites
AU - Zhang, B.
AU - Cui, Tianhong
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - A comparison of performance of three different types of graphene biosensors for the detection of prostate specific antigen was reported. Three different graphene structures were synthesized by mechanical exfoliation, microfluidic and self assembly respectively, representing graphene composites from pure to hybrid. Various parameters of different types of graphene biosensors were compared, such as detection limits, sensitivity, stability, etc. Hybridized materials in the graphene composites will change the electrical stability. However, hybrid or decorated materials enhance the absorption of target molecule, which introduce much higher sensitivity and detection limits. As were expected, self assembled graphene biosensor demonstrated the highest detection limits and sensitivity, but showed poor stability. On the other hand, pure graphene and microfluidic induced graphene presented lower detection limits and sensitivity, but better stability due to the absence of hybrid polymer in the graphene composites. The results and discussion demonstrated here can provide a guidance for the design of graphene based biosensors.
AB - A comparison of performance of three different types of graphene biosensors for the detection of prostate specific antigen was reported. Three different graphene structures were synthesized by mechanical exfoliation, microfluidic and self assembly respectively, representing graphene composites from pure to hybrid. Various parameters of different types of graphene biosensors were compared, such as detection limits, sensitivity, stability, etc. Hybridized materials in the graphene composites will change the electrical stability. However, hybrid or decorated materials enhance the absorption of target molecule, which introduce much higher sensitivity and detection limits. As were expected, self assembled graphene biosensor demonstrated the highest detection limits and sensitivity, but showed poor stability. On the other hand, pure graphene and microfluidic induced graphene presented lower detection limits and sensitivity, but better stability due to the absence of hybrid polymer in the graphene composites. The results and discussion demonstrated here can provide a guidance for the design of graphene based biosensors.
KW - Cancer sensor
KW - Graphene
KW - Hybrid nanocomposite
KW - Microfluidic
KW - Self assembly
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84907300053&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84907300053&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84907300053
SN - 9781632666246
T3 - 17th International Conference on Miniaturized Systems for Chemistry and Life Sciences, MicroTAS 2013
SP - 203
EP - 205
BT - 17th International Conference on Miniaturized Systems for Chemistry and Life Sciences, MicroTAS 2013
PB - Chemical and Biological Microsystems Society
T2 - 17th International Conference on Miniaturized Systems for Chemistry and Life Sciences, MicroTAS 2013
Y2 - 27 October 2013 through 31 October 2013
ER -