TY - JOUR
T1 - Can video technology improve teacher evaluations? An experimental study
AU - Kane, Thomas J.
AU - Blazar, David
AU - Gehlbach, Hunter
AU - Gehlbach, Hunter
AU - Quinn, David M.
AU - Thal, Daniel
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Association for Education Finance and Policy.
PY - 2020/6/1
Y1 - 2020/6/1
N2 - Teacher evaluation reform has been among the most controversial education reforms in recent years. It also is one of the costliest in terms of the time teachers and principals must spend on classroom observations.We conducted a randomized field trial at four sites to evaluatewhether substituting teacher-collected videos for in-person observations could improve the value of teacher observations for teachers, administrators, or students. Relative to teachers in the control group who participated in standard in-person observations, teachers in the video-based treatment group reported that post-observation meetings were more “supportive” and they were more able to identify a specific practice they changed afterward. Treatment principals were able to shift their observation work to noninstructional times. The program also substantially increased teacher retention. Nevertheless, the intervention did not improve students’ academic achievement or self-reported classroom experiences, either in the year of the intervention or for the next cohort of students. Following from the literature on observation and feedback cycles in low-stakes settings, we hypothesize that to improve student outcomes schools may need to pair video feedback with more specific supports for desired changes in practice.
AB - Teacher evaluation reform has been among the most controversial education reforms in recent years. It also is one of the costliest in terms of the time teachers and principals must spend on classroom observations.We conducted a randomized field trial at four sites to evaluatewhether substituting teacher-collected videos for in-person observations could improve the value of teacher observations for teachers, administrators, or students. Relative to teachers in the control group who participated in standard in-person observations, teachers in the video-based treatment group reported that post-observation meetings were more “supportive” and they were more able to identify a specific practice they changed afterward. Treatment principals were able to shift their observation work to noninstructional times. The program also substantially increased teacher retention. Nevertheless, the intervention did not improve students’ academic achievement or self-reported classroom experiences, either in the year of the intervention or for the next cohort of students. Following from the literature on observation and feedback cycles in low-stakes settings, we hypothesize that to improve student outcomes schools may need to pair video feedback with more specific supports for desired changes in practice.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85090625525&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85090625525&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1162/edfp_a_00289
DO - 10.1162/edfp_a_00289
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85090625525
SN - 1557-3060
VL - 15
SP - 397
EP - 427
JO - Education Finance and Policy
JF - Education Finance and Policy
IS - 3
ER -