Can parks protect migratory ungulates? The case of the Serengeti wildebeest

Simon Thirgood, Anna Mosser, Sebastian Tham, Grant Hopcraft, Ephraim Mwangomo, Titus Mlengeya, Morris Kilewo, John Fryxell, A. R.E. Sinclair, Markus Borner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

146 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The conservation of migratory species can be problematic because of their requirements for large protected areas. We investigated this issue by examining the annual movements of the migratory wildebeest, Connochaetes taurinus, in the 25 000 km2 Serengeti-Mara Ecosystem of Tanzania and Kenya. We used Global Positioning System telemetry to track eight wildebeest during 1999-2000 in relation to protected area status in different parts of the ecosystem. The collared wildebeest spent 90% of their time within well-protected core areas. However, two sections of the wildebeest migration route - the Ikoma Open Area and the Mara Group Ranches - currently receive limited protection and are threatened by poaching or agriculture. Comparison of current wildebeest migration routes to those recorded during 1971-73 indicates that the western buffer zones appear to be used more extensively than in the past. This tentative conclusion has important repercussions for management and needs further study. The current development of community-run Wildlife Management Areas as additional buffer zones around the Serengeti represents an important step in the conservation of this UNESCO World Heritage Site. This study demonstrates that detailed knowledge of movement of migratory species is required to plan effective conservation action.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)113-120
Number of pages8
JournalAnimal Conservation
Volume7
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2004

Fingerprint

ungulate
migratory species
migration route
buffer zone
protected area
World Heritage Site
poaching
wildlife management
ecosystem
UNESCO
telemetry
GPS
agriculture

Cite this

Thirgood, S., Mosser, A., Tham, S., Hopcraft, G., Mwangomo, E., Mlengeya, T., ... Borner, M. (2004). Can parks protect migratory ungulates? The case of the Serengeti wildebeest. Animal Conservation, 7(2), 113-120. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1367943004001404

Can parks protect migratory ungulates? The case of the Serengeti wildebeest. / Thirgood, Simon; Mosser, Anna; Tham, Sebastian; Hopcraft, Grant; Mwangomo, Ephraim; Mlengeya, Titus; Kilewo, Morris; Fryxell, John; Sinclair, A. R.E.; Borner, Markus.

In: Animal Conservation, Vol. 7, No. 2, 01.05.2004, p. 113-120.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Thirgood, S, Mosser, A, Tham, S, Hopcraft, G, Mwangomo, E, Mlengeya, T, Kilewo, M, Fryxell, J, Sinclair, ARE & Borner, M 2004, 'Can parks protect migratory ungulates? The case of the Serengeti wildebeest', Animal Conservation, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 113-120. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1367943004001404
Thirgood, Simon ; Mosser, Anna ; Tham, Sebastian ; Hopcraft, Grant ; Mwangomo, Ephraim ; Mlengeya, Titus ; Kilewo, Morris ; Fryxell, John ; Sinclair, A. R.E. ; Borner, Markus. / Can parks protect migratory ungulates? The case of the Serengeti wildebeest. In: Animal Conservation. 2004 ; Vol. 7, No. 2. pp. 113-120.
@article{589766b87069491ca5d64b007fe0ae57,
title = "Can parks protect migratory ungulates? The case of the Serengeti wildebeest",
abstract = "The conservation of migratory species can be problematic because of their requirements for large protected areas. We investigated this issue by examining the annual movements of the migratory wildebeest, Connochaetes taurinus, in the 25 000 km2 Serengeti-Mara Ecosystem of Tanzania and Kenya. We used Global Positioning System telemetry to track eight wildebeest during 1999-2000 in relation to protected area status in different parts of the ecosystem. The collared wildebeest spent 90{\%} of their time within well-protected core areas. However, two sections of the wildebeest migration route - the Ikoma Open Area and the Mara Group Ranches - currently receive limited protection and are threatened by poaching or agriculture. Comparison of current wildebeest migration routes to those recorded during 1971-73 indicates that the western buffer zones appear to be used more extensively than in the past. This tentative conclusion has important repercussions for management and needs further study. The current development of community-run Wildlife Management Areas as additional buffer zones around the Serengeti represents an important step in the conservation of this UNESCO World Heritage Site. This study demonstrates that detailed knowledge of movement of migratory species is required to plan effective conservation action.",
author = "Simon Thirgood and Anna Mosser and Sebastian Tham and Grant Hopcraft and Ephraim Mwangomo and Titus Mlengeya and Morris Kilewo and John Fryxell and Sinclair, {A. R.E.} and Markus Borner",
year = "2004",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S1367943004001404",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "113--120",
journal = "Animal Conservation",
issn = "1367-9430",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can parks protect migratory ungulates? The case of the Serengeti wildebeest

AU - Thirgood, Simon

AU - Mosser, Anna

AU - Tham, Sebastian

AU - Hopcraft, Grant

AU - Mwangomo, Ephraim

AU - Mlengeya, Titus

AU - Kilewo, Morris

AU - Fryxell, John

AU - Sinclair, A. R.E.

AU - Borner, Markus

PY - 2004/5/1

Y1 - 2004/5/1

N2 - The conservation of migratory species can be problematic because of their requirements for large protected areas. We investigated this issue by examining the annual movements of the migratory wildebeest, Connochaetes taurinus, in the 25 000 km2 Serengeti-Mara Ecosystem of Tanzania and Kenya. We used Global Positioning System telemetry to track eight wildebeest during 1999-2000 in relation to protected area status in different parts of the ecosystem. The collared wildebeest spent 90% of their time within well-protected core areas. However, two sections of the wildebeest migration route - the Ikoma Open Area and the Mara Group Ranches - currently receive limited protection and are threatened by poaching or agriculture. Comparison of current wildebeest migration routes to those recorded during 1971-73 indicates that the western buffer zones appear to be used more extensively than in the past. This tentative conclusion has important repercussions for management and needs further study. The current development of community-run Wildlife Management Areas as additional buffer zones around the Serengeti represents an important step in the conservation of this UNESCO World Heritage Site. This study demonstrates that detailed knowledge of movement of migratory species is required to plan effective conservation action.

AB - The conservation of migratory species can be problematic because of their requirements for large protected areas. We investigated this issue by examining the annual movements of the migratory wildebeest, Connochaetes taurinus, in the 25 000 km2 Serengeti-Mara Ecosystem of Tanzania and Kenya. We used Global Positioning System telemetry to track eight wildebeest during 1999-2000 in relation to protected area status in different parts of the ecosystem. The collared wildebeest spent 90% of their time within well-protected core areas. However, two sections of the wildebeest migration route - the Ikoma Open Area and the Mara Group Ranches - currently receive limited protection and are threatened by poaching or agriculture. Comparison of current wildebeest migration routes to those recorded during 1971-73 indicates that the western buffer zones appear to be used more extensively than in the past. This tentative conclusion has important repercussions for management and needs further study. The current development of community-run Wildlife Management Areas as additional buffer zones around the Serengeti represents an important step in the conservation of this UNESCO World Heritage Site. This study demonstrates that detailed knowledge of movement of migratory species is required to plan effective conservation action.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=20044383383&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=20044383383&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S1367943004001404

DO - 10.1017/S1367943004001404

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:20044383383

VL - 7

SP - 113

EP - 120

JO - Animal Conservation

JF - Animal Conservation

SN - 1367-9430

IS - 2

ER -