Abstract
Chemoradiotherapy is the most common treatment for inoperable esophageal cancer. However, there is no consensus on the delineation of the clinical target volume. Elective nodal irradiation (ENI) is recommended for inoperable esophageal cancer. A few studies have reported a decrease in the incidence of radiation-related toxicity of involved-field irradiation (IFI) for esophageal cancer. A systematic review and pooled analysis were performed to determine whether IFI in definitive chemoradiotherapy was more beneficial than ENI for esophageal cancer. The results showed no significant differences in the overall survival and local control rates between the IFI and ENI arms. Meanwhile, the incidences of esophageal and lung toxicities were significantly decreased in the IFI arm. These results suggest that IFI is a feasible treatment option for locally advanced esophageal cancer, especially to minimize irradiation-related toxicity.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 2087-2095 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | OncoTargets and Therapy |
| Volume | 10 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Apr 11 2017 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2017 Wang et al.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Chemoradiotherapy
- Elective nodal irradiation
- Esophageal cancer
- Involved-field irradiation
- Meta-analysis
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Can involved-field irradiation replace elective nodal irradiation in chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS