Can hygroscopic expansion compensate polymerization shrinkage? Part I. Deformation of restored teeth

Antheunis Versluis, Daranee Tantbirojn, Michael S. Lee, Lam S. Tu, Ralph Delong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

63 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: Restorative materials exhibit contraction and expansion due to polymerization and water absorption. Each process deforms and stresses a restored tooth structure in opposite direction. This study evaluated the tooth deformations during these competing processes. Methods: Large MOD cavities were prepared in 10 extracted molars. Five were restored with a hydrophobic resin composite (Filtek Supreme, 3M ESPE) and the others with a hydrophilic resin-modified glass-ionomer (Ketac Nano, 3M ESPE). The restored molars and two unrestored controls were stored in water for 24 weeks. The molars were digitized with an optical scanner at baseline, after preparation, restoration, and at 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, and 24 weeks water immersion. The digitized buccal, lingual, and restoration surfaces were analyzed to determine their deformation patterns. The results were statistically analyzed using ANOVA followed by Student-Newman-Keuls post hoc tests (p = 0.05). Results: The buccal and lingual tooth surfaces moved 13-14 μm inward after restoration. After water immersion, cuspal deformation in the resin composite group gradually decreased, reversing the shrinkage deformation within four weeks. The immersed resin-modified glass ionomer group reversed shrinkage deformation within one week, and continued to expand further to 28 μm after 24 weeks. Cuspal deformations after water immersion were significantly different with the two restoratives. Restoration surfaces also expanded after water immersion, while the control teeth showed no significant deformation. Significance: Polymerization shrinkage deformation was compensated by hygroscopic expansion within 4 weeks in teeth restored with a hydrophobic resin composite, while a hydrophilic restorative over-compensated polymerization shrinkage within 1 week causing tooth expansion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)126-133
Number of pages8
JournalDental Materials
Volume27
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2011

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Supported by Non-Tenured Faculty Grant (3M Foundation) and the University of Minnesota School of Dentistry Summer Research Fellowship Program . The authors would like to thank Yang Sue for his assistance with the Cumulus software, 3M ESPE for data acquisition with the LAVA scanning system and the materials used in the study, and Mr. J.C. Dalrymple for his creative fixture design.

Keywords

  • Cusp flexure
  • Hygroscopic expansion
  • Polymerization shrinkage
  • Tooth deformation
  • Water absorption

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Can hygroscopic expansion compensate polymerization shrinkage? Part I. Deformation of restored teeth'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this