Can ecosystems be healthy? Critical consideration of concepts

P. Calow

doi:10.1007/BF00044403

Can ecosystems be healthy? Critical consideration of concepts

P. Calow

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

62 Scopus citations

Abstract

Health, it is argued, implies that a system has an optimum state that can be defended. For organisms and populations this can be understood objectively and generally in terms of neo-Darwinian principles. Similar reasoning cannot be applied to ecosystems. The possible advantages and difficulties of applying this concept of health to ecosystems are critically considered.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	1-5
Number of pages	5
Journal	JOURNAL OF AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM HEALTH
Volume	1
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00044403
State	Published - Mar 1 1992

Keywords

analogy
control
fitness
optimization
teleology

Access

10.1007/BF00044403

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Can ecosystems be healthy? Critical consideration of concepts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@article{4ba9e36004454178878acc886049c0e8,

title = "Can ecosystems be healthy? Critical consideration of concepts",

abstract = "Health, it is argued, implies that a system has an optimum state that can be defended. For organisms and populations this can be understood objectively and generally in terms of neo-Darwinian principles. Similar reasoning cannot be applied to ecosystems. The possible advantages and difficulties of applying this concept of health to ecosystems are critically considered.",

keywords = "analogy, control, fitness, optimization, teleology",

author = "P. Calow",

year = "1992",

month = mar,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1007/BF00044403",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "1",

pages = "1--5",

journal = "Hydrobiologia",

issn = "0018-8158",

publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can ecosystems be healthy? Critical consideration of concepts

AU - Calow, P.

PY - 1992/3/1

Y1 - 1992/3/1

N2 - Health, it is argued, implies that a system has an optimum state that can be defended. For organisms and populations this can be understood objectively and generally in terms of neo-Darwinian principles. Similar reasoning cannot be applied to ecosystems. The possible advantages and difficulties of applying this concept of health to ecosystems are critically considered.

AB - Health, it is argued, implies that a system has an optimum state that can be defended. For organisms and populations this can be understood objectively and generally in terms of neo-Darwinian principles. Similar reasoning cannot be applied to ecosystems. The possible advantages and difficulties of applying this concept of health to ecosystems are critically considered.

KW - analogy

KW - control

KW - fitness

KW - optimization

KW - teleology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34249835800&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34249835800&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF00044403

DO - 10.1007/BF00044403

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:34249835800

VL - 1

SP - 1

EP - 5

JO - Hydrobiologia

JF - Hydrobiologia

SN - 0018-8158

IS - 1

ER -

Can ecosystems be healthy? Critical consideration of concepts

Abstract

Keywords

Access

Other files and links

Cite this