TY - JOUR
T1 - Building to learn
T2 - Information technology innovations to enable rapid pragmatic evaluation in a learning health system
AU - Rajamani, Geetanjali
AU - Melton, Genevieve B.
AU - Pestka, Deborah L.
AU - Peters, Maya
AU - Ninkovic, Iva
AU - Lindemann, Elizabeth
AU - Beebe, Timothy J.
AU - Shippee, Nathan
AU - Benson, Bradley
AU - Jacob, Abraham
AU - Tignanelli, Christopher
AU - Ingraham, Nicholas E.
AU - Koopmeiners, Joseph S.
AU - Usher, Michael G.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors. Learning Health Systems published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of University of Michigan.
PY - 2024/7
Y1 - 2024/7
N2 - Background: Learning health systems (LHSs) iteratively generate evidence that can be implemented into practice to improve care and produce generalizable knowledge. Pragmatic clinical trials fit well within LHSs as they combine real-world data and experiences with a degree of methodological rigor which supports generalizability. Objectives: We established a pragmatic clinical trial unit (“RapidEval”) to support the development of an LHS. To further advance the field of LHS, we sought to further characterize the role of health information technology (HIT), including innovative solutions and challenges that occur, to improve LHS project delivery. Methods: During the period from December 2021 to February 2023, eight projects were selected out of 51 applications to the RapidEval program, of which five were implemented, one is currently in pilot testing, and two are in planning. We evaluated pre-study planning, implementation, analysis, and study closure approaches across all RapidEval initiatives to summarize approaches across studies and identify key innovations and learnings by gathering data from study investigators, quality staff, and IT staff, as well as RapidEval staff and leadership. Implementation (Results): Implementation approaches spanned a range of HIT capabilities including interruptive alerts, clinical decision support integrated into order systems, patient navigators, embedded micro-education, targeted outpatient hand-off documentation, and patient communication. Study approaches include pre-post with time-concordant controls (1), randomized stepped-wedge (1), cluster randomized across providers (1) and location (3), and simple patient level randomization (2). Conclusions: Study selection, design, deployment, data collection, and analysis required close collaboration between data analysts, informaticists, and the RapidEval team.
AB - Background: Learning health systems (LHSs) iteratively generate evidence that can be implemented into practice to improve care and produce generalizable knowledge. Pragmatic clinical trials fit well within LHSs as they combine real-world data and experiences with a degree of methodological rigor which supports generalizability. Objectives: We established a pragmatic clinical trial unit (“RapidEval”) to support the development of an LHS. To further advance the field of LHS, we sought to further characterize the role of health information technology (HIT), including innovative solutions and challenges that occur, to improve LHS project delivery. Methods: During the period from December 2021 to February 2023, eight projects were selected out of 51 applications to the RapidEval program, of which five were implemented, one is currently in pilot testing, and two are in planning. We evaluated pre-study planning, implementation, analysis, and study closure approaches across all RapidEval initiatives to summarize approaches across studies and identify key innovations and learnings by gathering data from study investigators, quality staff, and IT staff, as well as RapidEval staff and leadership. Implementation (Results): Implementation approaches spanned a range of HIT capabilities including interruptive alerts, clinical decision support integrated into order systems, patient navigators, embedded micro-education, targeted outpatient hand-off documentation, and patient communication. Study approaches include pre-post with time-concordant controls (1), randomized stepped-wedge (1), cluster randomized across providers (1) and location (3), and simple patient level randomization (2). Conclusions: Study selection, design, deployment, data collection, and analysis required close collaboration between data analysts, informaticists, and the RapidEval team.
KW - health information technology
KW - learning health systems
KW - pragmatic trials
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85190999261&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85190999261&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/lrh2.10420
DO - 10.1002/lrh2.10420
M3 - Article
C2 - 39036531
AN - SCOPUS:85190999261
SN - 2379-6146
VL - 8
JO - Learning Health Systems
JF - Learning Health Systems
IS - 3
M1 - e10420
ER -