Brilliant-thighed poison frogs do not use acoustic identity information to treat territorial neighbours as dear enemies

James P. Tumulty, Andrius Pašukonis, Max Ringler, James D Forester, Walter Hödl, Mark A Bee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Some territorial animals recognize familiar neighbours and are less aggressive to established neighbours than they are to strangers. This form of social recognition produces a ‘dear enemy’ effect, which may allow animals to reduce the costs of territory defence. The dear enemy effect is thought to reflect either the decreased threat posed by neighbours relative to strangers (the relative threat hypothesis) or the decreased need for escalation with increasing familiarity between neighbours (the familiarity hypothesis). We tested for a vocally mediated dear enemy effect in male brilliant-thighed poison frogs, Allobates femoralis. In this species, the familiarity hypothesis predicts a dear enemy effect, because males defend long-term stable territories and should be familiar with the calls of their neighbours. In contrast, the relative threat hypothesis does not predict a dear enemy effect, because neighbours and strangers both represent competitors for mates and likely pose equivalent threats. Acoustic analyses showed that males produce individually distinctive advertisement calls. Two playback experiments were conducted to determine whether territorial males respond less aggressively to neighbours' calls than to strangers' calls based on this acoustic identity information. In the first experiment, males pursued acoustically simulated neighbours and strangers to similar distances when calls were played both from the direction of the neighbour's territory and from a direction with no neighbours. In the second experiment, males responded aggressively to neighbours' and strangers' calls at similar threshold amplitudes and pursued these calls to similar distances. Hence, two different playback experiments failed to find evidence of a vocally mediated dear enemy effect. Our results support the hypothesis that territorial animals respond to the relative threat posed by neighbours and strangers regardless of their level of familiarity with neighbours.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)203-220
Number of pages18
JournalAnimal Behaviour
Volume141
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2018

Fingerprint

frog
acoustics
familiarity
animal
experiment
animals
effect
poison
Allobates femoralis
cost

Keywords

  • Allobates femoralis
  • advertisement call
  • dear enemy effect
  • identity information
  • poison frog
  • social recognition
  • territory defence
  • vocal communication

Cite this

Brilliant-thighed poison frogs do not use acoustic identity information to treat territorial neighbours as dear enemies. / Tumulty, James P.; Pašukonis, Andrius; Ringler, Max; Forester, James D; Hödl, Walter; Bee, Mark A.

In: Animal Behaviour, Vol. 141, 01.07.2018, p. 203-220.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6c0b42e337c046c5a0e717af1cd0a1c2,
title = "Brilliant-thighed poison frogs do not use acoustic identity information to treat territorial neighbours as dear enemies",
abstract = "Some territorial animals recognize familiar neighbours and are less aggressive to established neighbours than they are to strangers. This form of social recognition produces a ‘dear enemy’ effect, which may allow animals to reduce the costs of territory defence. The dear enemy effect is thought to reflect either the decreased threat posed by neighbours relative to strangers (the relative threat hypothesis) or the decreased need for escalation with increasing familiarity between neighbours (the familiarity hypothesis). We tested for a vocally mediated dear enemy effect in male brilliant-thighed poison frogs, Allobates femoralis. In this species, the familiarity hypothesis predicts a dear enemy effect, because males defend long-term stable territories and should be familiar with the calls of their neighbours. In contrast, the relative threat hypothesis does not predict a dear enemy effect, because neighbours and strangers both represent competitors for mates and likely pose equivalent threats. Acoustic analyses showed that males produce individually distinctive advertisement calls. Two playback experiments were conducted to determine whether territorial males respond less aggressively to neighbours' calls than to strangers' calls based on this acoustic identity information. In the first experiment, males pursued acoustically simulated neighbours and strangers to similar distances when calls were played both from the direction of the neighbour's territory and from a direction with no neighbours. In the second experiment, males responded aggressively to neighbours' and strangers' calls at similar threshold amplitudes and pursued these calls to similar distances. Hence, two different playback experiments failed to find evidence of a vocally mediated dear enemy effect. Our results support the hypothesis that territorial animals respond to the relative threat posed by neighbours and strangers regardless of their level of familiarity with neighbours.",
keywords = "Allobates femoralis, advertisement call, dear enemy effect, identity information, poison frog, social recognition, territory defence, vocal communication",
author = "Tumulty, {James P.} and Andrius Pašukonis and Max Ringler and Forester, {James D} and Walter H{\"o}dl and Bee, {Mark A}",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.anbehav.2018.05.008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "141",
pages = "203--220",
journal = "Animal Behaviour",
issn = "0003-3472",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Brilliant-thighed poison frogs do not use acoustic identity information to treat territorial neighbours as dear enemies

AU - Tumulty, James P.

AU - Pašukonis, Andrius

AU - Ringler, Max

AU - Forester, James D

AU - Hödl, Walter

AU - Bee, Mark A

PY - 2018/7/1

Y1 - 2018/7/1

N2 - Some territorial animals recognize familiar neighbours and are less aggressive to established neighbours than they are to strangers. This form of social recognition produces a ‘dear enemy’ effect, which may allow animals to reduce the costs of territory defence. The dear enemy effect is thought to reflect either the decreased threat posed by neighbours relative to strangers (the relative threat hypothesis) or the decreased need for escalation with increasing familiarity between neighbours (the familiarity hypothesis). We tested for a vocally mediated dear enemy effect in male brilliant-thighed poison frogs, Allobates femoralis. In this species, the familiarity hypothesis predicts a dear enemy effect, because males defend long-term stable territories and should be familiar with the calls of their neighbours. In contrast, the relative threat hypothesis does not predict a dear enemy effect, because neighbours and strangers both represent competitors for mates and likely pose equivalent threats. Acoustic analyses showed that males produce individually distinctive advertisement calls. Two playback experiments were conducted to determine whether territorial males respond less aggressively to neighbours' calls than to strangers' calls based on this acoustic identity information. In the first experiment, males pursued acoustically simulated neighbours and strangers to similar distances when calls were played both from the direction of the neighbour's territory and from a direction with no neighbours. In the second experiment, males responded aggressively to neighbours' and strangers' calls at similar threshold amplitudes and pursued these calls to similar distances. Hence, two different playback experiments failed to find evidence of a vocally mediated dear enemy effect. Our results support the hypothesis that territorial animals respond to the relative threat posed by neighbours and strangers regardless of their level of familiarity with neighbours.

AB - Some territorial animals recognize familiar neighbours and are less aggressive to established neighbours than they are to strangers. This form of social recognition produces a ‘dear enemy’ effect, which may allow animals to reduce the costs of territory defence. The dear enemy effect is thought to reflect either the decreased threat posed by neighbours relative to strangers (the relative threat hypothesis) or the decreased need for escalation with increasing familiarity between neighbours (the familiarity hypothesis). We tested for a vocally mediated dear enemy effect in male brilliant-thighed poison frogs, Allobates femoralis. In this species, the familiarity hypothesis predicts a dear enemy effect, because males defend long-term stable territories and should be familiar with the calls of their neighbours. In contrast, the relative threat hypothesis does not predict a dear enemy effect, because neighbours and strangers both represent competitors for mates and likely pose equivalent threats. Acoustic analyses showed that males produce individually distinctive advertisement calls. Two playback experiments were conducted to determine whether territorial males respond less aggressively to neighbours' calls than to strangers' calls based on this acoustic identity information. In the first experiment, males pursued acoustically simulated neighbours and strangers to similar distances when calls were played both from the direction of the neighbour's territory and from a direction with no neighbours. In the second experiment, males responded aggressively to neighbours' and strangers' calls at similar threshold amplitudes and pursued these calls to similar distances. Hence, two different playback experiments failed to find evidence of a vocally mediated dear enemy effect. Our results support the hypothesis that territorial animals respond to the relative threat posed by neighbours and strangers regardless of their level of familiarity with neighbours.

KW - Allobates femoralis

KW - advertisement call

KW - dear enemy effect

KW - identity information

KW - poison frog

KW - social recognition

KW - territory defence

KW - vocal communication

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049040986&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049040986&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.anbehav.2018.05.008

DO - 10.1016/j.anbehav.2018.05.008

M3 - Article

VL - 141

SP - 203

EP - 220

JO - Animal Behaviour

JF - Animal Behaviour

SN - 0003-3472

ER -